Discuss the differences in the quality of the reasoning

Reference no: EM132443528 , Length: 4 pages

Arguments assignment, you objectively and neutrally evaluated reasoning on each side of your question from non-scholarly sources.

For this assignment, you will objectively and neutrally evaluate and present the reasoning from scholarly sources on the same question. For an example of how to complete this paper, take a look at the Week Three ExamplePreview the document paper. Conduct research from scholarly sources on each side of your issue and write a paper that includes the following: Introduction (approximately 100 words) Explain your topic and state the specific question that you are addressing (be sure to incorporate any relevant feedback you got from the instructor on your first paper).

Presentation of an Argument

Describe the scholarly source on one side of the issue and summarize the key points made. (approximately 100 words)

Present what you see as the main argument from that source in standard form, with the premises listed above the conclusion. (approximately 100 words)

Evaluate the quality of the reasoning in this source.

You may address questions such as: How adequately the article supports the premises with research and how strongly the premises of the argument support the truth of the conclusion. (approximately 200 words) Presentation of an Opposing Argument

Describe the scholarly source on the other side of the issue and summarize the key points made. (approximately 100 words)

Present what you see as the main argument from that source in standard form, with the premises listed above the conclusion. (approximately 100 words)

Evaluate the quality of the reasoning in this source. You may address questions such as:

How adequately the article supports the premises with research and how strongly the premises of the argument support the truth of the conclusion. (approximately 200 words)

Evaluation of Arguments in Non-Scholarly and Scholarly Sources (approximately 200 words)

Discuss the differences in the quality of the reasoning or in the degree of support in the sources that you analyzed (Scholarly and Popular Resources.

Some specific types of questions you might address here include: Who is the target audience? What types of motives may be influencing these authors?

Discuss any logical fallacies in any of the sources. Conclusion (approximately 50 words)

Reflect on how this activity might influence how you conduct research in the future.

Reference no: EM132443528

Questions Cloud

Discuss the notion that firms should stop doing business : Discuss the notion that firms should stop doing business with customers who constantly generate losses versus the notion that the customer is always right.

How might offices physically change in the coming years : Given the growth in telecommuting and other mobile work arrangements, how might offices physically change in the coming years? Will offices as we think of them.

Compare the way in which we elect presidents in our current : Compare the way in which we elect Presidents in our current system to the proposal of the National Popular Vote movement. Which method is superior?

Consider the importance of csr audits : What are the benefits and dangers to a corporation from working with NGOs to conduct sustainability audits?

Discuss the differences in the quality of the reasoning : Discuss the differences in the quality of the reasoning or in the degree of support in the sources that you analyzed (Scholarly and Popular Resources

Causes of political behavior : For this assignment, make sure to first carefully review the background materials regarding the causes of political behavior

Discuss the team dynamics for a highly effective team : Discuss the team dynamics for a highly effective or ineffective team of which you were a member. Can you explain why the team performed so well or so poorly?

Discuss whether or not a manager can effectively perform : Discuss whether or not a manager can effectively perform his or her role without the ability to predict and control. 1-2 Paragraphs

Develop a new erm for the current organization : Chapter 12 presented the approach Intuit uses to measure the effectiveness of their ERM, and chapter 15 presented the process the City of Edmonton employed.

User Account

All Pages