Reference no: EM131549567

Question: module 6 dq 1 argument Deliah

The best method for this research design would be a case study. According to Grand Canyon University (2016a) a case study goes wherever relevant data is found. Interviews may be structured, semi-structured, or unstructured. Questionnaires can be closed- or open-ended, and observations can also take a variety of forms. Quantitative research provides empirical data relevant to the phenomenon studied. For example, a study involving a certain teaching technique may use quantitative test result data to gain a statistical measure of its effectiveness. The statistics may be of simple descriptive nature or in the form of correlational and causative comparative analysis. Depending on the phenomenon studied. In addition, as an in-depth examination of a phenomenon, its focus may be a process, program, activity, event, or individual. Case studies are holistic views of a complete unit. Case studies are holistic views of a complete unit as they attempt to understand a phenomenon in its entirety. Unlike other designs, a case study may employ both qualitative and quantitative data in its effort to gain an in-depth understanding of a phenomenon. (Adler & Clark, 2010; Grand Canyon University, 2016a; Grand Canyon University, 2016b; Johnson & Christensen, 2014). Therefore, a case study would be the best method for trying to understand this phenomenon, because the empirical data can reveal the statistical nature of the correlation and the observations can help the researcher gain insight into the actual activity, process, event, (receipt of the assistance) or individuals.