Reference no: EM131252796
For this assignment, consider the rhetorical situation surrounding the film, Persepolis. Define the context, catalyst, purpose, and audience. Consider what we have discussed in approaching a text as a writer would (Mike Bunn's article) and our rhetorical analyses of print advertisements. There is much to consider in the analysis of a film: the visuals (animation), score, point of view--everything that the film's creators have given their audience to persuade them of their purpose. Keep in mind that you have viewed almost the entire film, enough to gather the rhetorical situation. To define the context, do a bit of research. Come prepared to finish the film on Thursday after fall break and discuss its rhetorical components.
To refresh your memory of the rhetorical triangle/situation:
Catalyst: what prompted the text's author(s) to create the text in the first place?
Purpose: what is the text trying to say--its main point or thesis? Audience: who has the text been created for? Context: what surrounds the text--genre, author(s), date of publication, and historical, social, cultural, or political (among other) issues that may surround the text.
Your assignment should be at least one, full page in length, typed in Times New Roman 12 point font, with one inch margins all around. Your assignment must be uploaded to D2L as a word document before class, on Thursday, Oct. 13th, as the dropbox will close as soon as class begins. You may want to print out a copy of your assignment to refer to in class for discussion.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/wtadovdc2qsdayw/explore_an_issue.pdf?dl=0
|
Good at solving social problems
: Watch the video Michael Porter: Why business can be good at solving social problems. Post 1) what you garnered from the video 2) what social problem you feel business can solve at home or abroad and how this could be accomplished. 200 words minim..
|
|
Increasing payoffs and eliminating actions
: Give examples to show that neither of the above properties necessarily holds for a game that is not strictly competitive.
|
|
What is her central argument
: Here are some questions to keep in mind: What is her central argument? Does she argue it effectively? What are her argument's strengths and weaknesses? Is there anything she is overlooking? Do you agree or disagree? Why
|
|
Common law contract principles
: Please discuss the questions below using common law contract principles.
|
|
Discuss rhetorical components
: What is the text trying to say--its main point or thesis? Audience: who has the text been created for?
|
|
Discuss your career goals as a healthcare administrator
: Discuss your career goals as a Healthcare Administrator following the completion of your master's degree. When conducting this research, consider selecting articles that support.
|
|
Prove or give a counter example to the claim
: Either prove or give a counter example to the claim that if the equilibrium payoff of player 1 in a strictly competitive game is v then any strategy pair that gives player 1 a payoff of v is an equilibrium.
|
|
Draw a decision tree for an algorithm solving this problem
: What is the information-theoretic lower bound for comparison-based algorithms solving this problem?
|
|
What are the requirements to take the credentialing exam
: What are the requirements to take the credentialing exam? What is the current cost and schedule for the exam? Would you take the exam to obtain the Certified Health Education Specialist credential? Why or why not
|