Reference no: EM131713912

Please confirm if you are going to work on it ! Please do not take too long,I'll really appreciate it!

For both discussions 1 & 2, There is no minimum words count or pages,just answer clearly, precise and concise.

Discussion 1: "Persuasion."

Aristotle defines "persuading through personal character" as our belief that a person is unbiased and has nothing to gain by lying to us.

Please respond to the following: Please type your answer followed by the question.

Describe a time when you chose to believe in "the person" giving you some sort of information rather than in the situation which, at least on the surface, appeared to be much different from what the person you trusted was saying to you about the situation.

In the end, who did you choose to believe? The trusted person or the "impersonal" situation?

If you had to do it over again, which one would you have trusted?

Discussion 2: "Examining Tu Quoque Fallacies."

Please respond to the following: Please type your answer followed by the question.

Describe a time when you were guilty of the fallacy of Tu Quoque. (If you have ever said, "Yes, I did X but she did Y first," then you have committed a Tu Quoque fallacy.)

Explain honestly whether you thought that justifying your behavior based on the behavior of someone else legitimized your own behavior in some way.

Explain whether you think that you will respond in the same way if a similar challenge is raised again.