Reference no: EM133465040
Case Study: For this discussion students will match a more modern American President to the following categories:
Good: identify an American President that you have an affinity for, and then explain what makes that President "good."Bad: identify an American President that you think performed poorly in his constitutional duties, and then explain what makes that President "bad."Ugly: identify an American President that you think brought shame to the executive office, and then explain what makes that President's behavior/policies "ugly."
Students can only assess the following Presidents:Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush I, or Clinton.
Students can focus on one President, or write about two or three, depending on their assessments. For instance, if you think Ford met all three categories, then explain why. Or if you think Nixon was "good," but Bush I was both "bad" and "ugly," explain why.
Three categories, up to three Presidents.
Criteria:--Each assessment should be a paragraph long. 3 categories, 3 paragraphs long.--Students will also respond to a classmates' post. Your response to a classmates' post should be about a paragraph long and of substance. Be cordial in your response to a classmates' post. You only need to respond to one part of your classmates' post.
--The entire exercise should be 4 paragraphs. The first paragraph should be an introduction.
--Because this discussion is less formal than the essays and allows students to express their "opinions" without the accompanying "academic research," students do not need to reference sources. Still, the discussion should be informed by the readings associated with module 8 on Contemporary American history and students need to base their assessments on actual historical information.
Purpose:
This discussion asks you to apply the concepts from the module's readings to evaluate a recent U.S. President. This practice helps you to develop the skill of defending a position using logic and evidence. You have the opportunity here to practice applying, translating, and re-working what you have learned to function in unexpected ways.Learning
Objectives
Question 1. Discuss key events, figures, and ideas of the recent history of the United States.
Question 2. Contextualize, criticize, defend, and debate significant ideas found in historical primary sources of the recent history of the United States.
College regarding ferpa rights of students
: What are three pieces of advice you would give to administrators at an elementary, secondary or post-secondary college regarding FERPA rights of students?
|
Implicated by off-label promotional practices
: What is the laws that are implicated by off-label promotional practices; the government agencies that are charged with enforcing those laws;
|
Why do you think eastern orthodoxy and roman catholicism
: why you think Calvinist Protestantism had a greater affinity with the so-called ‘Age of Reason' of the Enlightenment. Why do you think Eastern Orthodoxy
|
Common foreign and security policy
: Common Foreign and Security Policy of the EU: evolution, basic characteristics and objectives of the CFSP, member states' obligations under the CFSP
|
Discuss key events, figures, and ideas of the recent history
: Discuss key events, figures, and ideas of the recent history of the United States. - Contextualize, criticize, defend, and debate significant ideas found
|
Write Negligence IRAC based
: Sarah is rushed to the hospital emergency room with a concussion and a broken tooth.
|
Actual practical functionality of constructive trusts
: Discuss the actual practical functionality of constructive trusts, secret trusts and generation skipping trusts in Kenya.
|
Write something exploring cultural advances that occurred
: Write something exploring the cultural advances that occurred under the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal Empires. You might include artistic, intellectual
|
Cognome in your own culture
: What value has il Cognome in your own culture?
|