In-text referencing and reference list follows Harvard style and consistent with KBS guidelines Frequent errors and/or inconsistent application of Harvard referencing conventions. Some errors and/or inconsistent application of Harvard referencing conventions. A few errors and/or inconsistent application of Harvard referencing conventions. Minimal errors and/or inconsistent application of Harvard referencing conventions. No errors and/or inconsistent application of Harvard referencing conventions. /1 Word count is within + / 10% of requirement Word-count is not within +/- 10% of requirement. Word-count is within +/- 10% of requirement. Word-count is within +/- 10% of requirement. Word-count is within +/- 10% of requirement. Word-count is within +/- 10% of requirement. /1

Correct academic writing style used, including correct spelling, grammar and punctuation Writing quality is an inadequate standard with substantial errors. Writing quality is a reasonable standard with moderate errors. Writing quality is a good standard with some errors. Writing quality is a high standard with minimal errors. Writing quality is of an impeccable standard with no errors. /1 Format of answer consistent with question requirements and KBS guidelines Format of answer poorly follows the question requirement and KBS guidelines. Format of answer partially follows the question requirementt and KBS guidelines. Format of answer mainly follows he question requirement and KBS guidelines. Format of answer substantially follows the question requirementf and KBS guidelines. Format of answer faultlessly ollows the question requirement and KBS guidelines. /1

Answer clearly and logically presented Answer presented is not clear and logical. Answer presented is somewhat clear and logical. Answer presented is mainly clear and logical. Answer presented is substantially clear and logical. Answer presented is exceptionally clear and logical. /1 Appropriate theory and research used to answer question posed Answer unsatisfactorily incorporates, integrates and applies theory and research. Answer satisfactorily incorporates but only minimally integrates and applies theory and research. Answer partially incorporates, integrates and applies theory and research. Answer predominantly incorporates, integrates and applies theory and research. Answer skilfully incorporates, integrates and applies theory and research. /1

Reflection on insights gained for potential career in a culturally diverse global organisation No reflection on insights for potential career in a culturally diverse global organisation. Superficial reflection on insights for potential career in a culturally diverse global organisation. Good reflection on insights for potential career in a culturally diverse global organisation. Very good reflection on insights for potential career in a culturally diverse global organisation. Very thorough reflection on insights for potential career in a culturally diverse global organisation /6

Critical review of assessment of self integrating feedback received from associates No evaluation and reflection of the differences in assessment results (own personal assessment vs. feedback received). Fair evaluation and reflection of the differences in assessment results (own personal assessment vs. feedback received) Good evaluation and reflection of the differences in assessment results (own personal assessment vs. feedback received). Very good critical evaluation and reflection of the differences in assessment results (own personal assessment vs. feedback received). Excellent critical evaluation and reflection of the differences in assessment results (own personal assessment vs. feedback received) /10 Theory integration No effort to integrate concepts and theories in support of discussion and reflection Little effort to integrate concepts and theories from in support of discussion and reflection Good use of the concepts and theories from in support of discussion and reflection. Very good use of the concepts and theories in support of discussion and reflection. Excellent use of the concepts and theories in support of discussion and reflection. /6

Criteria F (Fail) 0%-49% P (Pass) 50%64% CR (Credit) 65%-74% D (Distinction) 75% - 84% HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% Mark Assessment Content (Subject specific) OUT OF 24 MARKS Provided evidence of completed surveys (of selfevaluation and two associates’ evaluation) Attached evidence of required surveys of yours as well as two other chosen associates (colleagues, friends or family). Marks will be deducted proportionally for missing surveys or partially completed surveys. /2

• This paper requires a significant amount of analysis and personal reflection. This means that you should consider the Johari Window model by breaking down its four parts and reflecting on how the various quadrants provide a deeper understanding of yourself. • The attached marking rubrics guide the marker when awarding marks for your reflective essay. You should review your paper in line with this to ensure there is nothing you have missed.