Reference no: EM133683954

Question 1.

When discussing ethics and morals, a common topic of debate involves whether these concepts are relative (i.e., our ideas regarding right and wrong will vary significantly based upon our upbringing, culture, religious beliefs, etc.) or absolute (i.e., certain actions are absolutely right or wrong, regardless of our upbringing, culture, religious beliefs, etc.).

In your opinion, is all morality relative (i.e., simply an individual's definition of right and wrong), or are certain moral concepts absolute? Should everyone have the right to decide which behaviors are acceptable or unacceptable?

Could variances in the manner in which criminal justice professionals view morals and ethics as either absolute or relative impact day-to-day decision making? Explain your answer.

Question 2.

After reading the History of the Supreme Court Exclusionary Rule article, select one of the four highlighted cases and answer the below questions.

Briefly explain your selected case, then discuss how the ruling in the case impacts an investigator's ability to obtain evidence during a criminal investigation.

Discuss in detail the impact of the exclusionary rule has on evidence illegally obtained.

Ensure you research your selected case further and do not exclusively rely on the article for a detailed description of the case.