Best service. Very easy to order, follow up and delivered on time. Easy payments which i liked very much. I would highly recommend this service to every student.

Pls send the project again to check I don't anywhere is the attachment from which website u take please find the attached 26823892_1project manajment.pdf kindly find the attachments for the projects. I want to be two part as the following: 1-part A to about nizwa banks. 2- part B about the company which the attachment attached u should finalize it in shortage.

dear team.. kindly find the attachments for the projects .. I wont to be tow part as the following : 1-part A to about nizwa bank. 2- part B about the company which the attachment attached u should finalized it in shortage. Work submitted up to 1 week (5 working days) after the due date for submission will lose 10% of the obtained mark (after internal moderation). Work submitted after this, but up to 2 weeks (10 working days) late will lose 20% of the overall obtained mark. Work tendered for submission more than 2 weeks (10 working days) after the due date will not be accepted and an absence will be recorded for the assessment concerned. This will count as a failed attempt and may result in you failing the module overall.

Deliverable (Poster presentation) Overall design and contents of poster (5 marks) Presentation skill; Q & A (2 + 3 marks) 10 Deliverable (Task 2) (Turnitin based Submission) Overall answer is in the context of Intel’s case study. However the work is incomplete in all aspects (1-5 marks) Adequate details provided but very generic. However the overall answer is in the context of Intel’s case study. Factors / issues / challenges explored partially. (6-13 marks) 25 Strategies explored and discussion of transformation of IT in Intel is good. Critically reviewed the strategies. Evidence of reading and analyzing case study. Overall good attempt. (14-19 marks) Discussion of transformation of IT in Intel is excellent. Critically reviewed all strategies excellently. Excellent presentation, logically structured, using correct grammar and spelling, excellent cross-referencing and links to supporting evidence. The answer is complete in all respects. (20-25 marks)

Work Proposal: (Turnitin based Submission) Proposal is incomplete but has relevant information (1-3 marks) Good proposal with relevant information (4-7 marks) Complete and excellent proposal (8-10 marks) 10 Deliverable (Task 1) (Turnitin based Submission) Research article ? Approach to the problem and research questions; objectives; (10 marks) ? Rigor of literature review; (10 marks) ? Methods or empirical analysis techniques; used data sources; (10 marks) ? Key findings and conclusions; (10 marks) Excellent: 8-10 marks; Good: 5-7 marks; Satisfactory: 1-4 marks. ? Citations and referencing (5 marks) ? IEEE format; Academic writing (5 marks) ? Proposing innovative IS/IT strategy (5 marks) Excellent: 5 marks; Good: 3-4 marks; Satisfactory: 1-2 marks 55

Assessment: Individual Assignment Intended Learning Outcomes: On completion of this module, the student will be able to: 1. Demonstrate a mastery of the complex skills and knowledge necessary to evaluate one or more strategic decision-making models. 2. Critically define the strategic choices that face organizations, using advanced skills in conducting research. 3. Critically identify the barriers to the implementation of strategic choices.

For a mark of 60-69% • Show a clear understanding of the activity. • Display knowledge of most of the principles, theories, methodologies, and practices involved and an ability to apply them effectively. • Provide evidence of wide reading. • Demonstrate an ability to select critical points and analyse them and draw sound conclusions. • Provide approaches that are creative and pragmatic. • Provide a supported critique of your own work. • Provide supported, discussions of further research that may be needed. • Provide a good individual contribution For a mark of 50-59% • Show an adequate understanding of the activity. • Display knowledge of some of the principles, theories, methodologies, and practices involved and an ability to apply them. • Provide evidence of some reading related to the proposal. • Demonstrate an ability to select key points in the exercise and analyse them. • Provide approaches that are less creative or might not be entirely practical. • Provide a critique of your own work. • Provide discussions of further research that may be needed. • Provide an adequate individual contribution

The assignment will be assessed out of 100 marks using the below mentioned criteria. For a mark of >69% • Show a thorough understanding of the purpose of the activity. • Display knowledge of the major principles, theories, methodologies, and practices involved and an ability to apply them effectively. • Provide evidence of wide reading, including academic journals. • Demonstrate an ability to select critical points, evaluate them and communicate the conclusions effectively. • Provide approaches that are creative, practicable, and supported. • Provide a sound, supported critique of your own work. • Provide sound and supported discussions of further research that may be needed. • Provide a very good individual contribution

Submit a work proposal for this assignment on 9th, which must include: > Understanding of deliverables – a detailed description of deliverables. > General overview of the given tasks – (Part A and Part B) - initial understanding of solution to all tasks with timeline to complete them and identification of literature resources. (10 marks) You may also include a draft version of the assignment to get feedback; however no marks allocated for the draft version. You should prepare an assignment of a single word file containing Part A and Part B.