Reference no: EM133474659
Question: Acme Corporation was a publicly traded corporation that operated shopping malls. Because of an economic slowdown, many of Acme's malls contained unrented commercial space. Additionally, the existence of surplus retail space located near many of Acme's malls prevented Acme from raising rents despite increasing costs incurred by Acme.
In June, Sally, president and sole owner of Bigco, approached Paul, Acme's president. She proposed a cash-out merger, in which Bigco would purchase for cash all shares of Acme, and Acme would merge into Bigco. Sally offered $100 for each outstanding share of Acme's stock even though Acme's stock was then currently trading at $50 per share and historically had never traded higher than $60 per share.
Paul, concerned about Acme's future, decided in good faith to pursue the merger. [In July, before discussing the deal with anyone, Paul telephoned his broker and purchased 5000 shares of Acme at $50 per share.] Paul then presented the proposed merger to Acme's board of directors and urged them to approve it. The board met, discussed the difference between the current market price and the offered price, and, without commissioning a corporate valuation study, voted to submit the proposed deal to a shareholder vote. The shareholders overwhelmingly approve the deal because of the immediate profit they would realize on their shares. Based solely on shareholder approval, the board unanimously approved the merger, and all shareholders received cash for their shares.
In December, shortly after completing the merger, Bigco closed most of the Acme malls and sold the properties at a substantial profit to a developer who intended to develop it for light industrial use
1) Did Paul violate any federal securities laws? Discuss 2) Did Paul breach any duties to Acme and/or its shareholders? Discuss 3) Did the board breach any duties to Acme and/or its shareholders? Discuss
Please IRAC the answers, meaning us the format listed as (Issue / Rule/ Analysis / Conclusion).