My MBA assignment is done in very well manner, i am really happy with the content and quality of the work. Expert has followed all the comments and exactly the requirements what was to be done. I am really happy with the work. My professor also praised for this work. Great guys.

Discussion The evaluation is adequate, adopts a descriptive approach and largely relates any theory used to practice in a superficial and descriptive application to a specific organisation. Recommendations Some recommendations have been offered but may be loosely based on some evaluation and analysis. Recommendations are adequate and may be just about capable of some attempts at implementation in this organisational context. Presentation and Persuasion The assignment is of an adequate standard. Concepts are not always expressed in a clear and systematic manner. There is quite limited referencing.

Mark Band Literature Review The student demonstrates adequate understanding of the knowledge of alternative definitions of ‘engagement’. Adequate knowledge of the subject matter and adequate attempts at description which may or may not identify similar concepts such as ‘involvement’, ‘participation’ and ‘commitment’ may be demonstrated.Adequate knowledge and analysis of behaviours and evidential signs for engagement such as organisational citizenship and discretionary behaviour may be adequately identified or demonstrated. The differences between engagement, non-engagement and disengagement may be identified or even adequately described. The student undertakes an adequate but highly descriptive review of the research linking engagement with organisational behaviour. Problems with identifying cause-effect relationships are may be evidenced, though significant gaps may exist. Adequate attempts may have been made to disentangle the reality from the rhetoric. Evidence based argument is quite narrowly demonstrated, illustrating adequate to threshold understanding of theory and/or organisational practice.

Conclusions and recommendations (Task 3, around 400 words) This section should initially answer your report objectives and draw together the main points from your analysis of literature and other discussion about your organisation. It summarises what has been learned from undertaking this research. It should also begin to weigh up the options available to the organisation and what would impede implementation of further action. It should reach an overall conclusion as to the impact of engagement, non-engagement and dis-engagement on your organisation and begins to identify the way forward. No new information should be presented in the conclusions. Make a considered initial list of no more than four relevant recommendations for improving engagement based upon your conclusions, clearly stating how they can add value to the organisation. Reference List A list of the third-party sources you have consulted and which are cited directly in the text. All these sources should be properly identified. Harvard style Appendices

Assignment Guidance Section / Title Details / Guidance University coversheet Include name, student ID number, unit title and code, assessment title, date of submission. Title page Title of your report. Address (to/from) and date the report. Contents Page Include page numbers. Introduction (Around 200 words). Short introduction to the report setting out what the aims and objectives of the report are, what the report will cover and why. You may want to provide a very brief overview of your organisation at this stage Literature Review (Task 1, around 800 words) Using relevant academic literature or practitioner-orientated material for support,briefly analyse the theoretical concept underpinning engagement, non-engagement and disengagement, explaining what it is and why engagement is such a ‘hot topic’ in management circles. Discussion (Task 2, around 600 words) Consider the existence and impact of employee engagement, non-engagement and dis-engagement on your organisation and how it affects the business performance.