Did they support their position convincingly with

Reference no: EM133487342

Case Study: First of all, criminality in not male or female, white, black, hispanic, or any other label that we want to attach. This is not a sentencing structure issue. The issue is horrible legislation!

The true issue with the female incarcerated population, especially pertaining to the drug trade, begins long before sentencing. We lost "the war on drugs." Bad! This was a huge failure! Our response was to enact laws that went after people that only had residual involvement. This legislation is toxic, this is where the reform is truly needed.

We need to stop trying to make ourselves better by cutting off the tail of the snake, and go straight for the head. If the laws do not make sense, are not right, do not positively impact society, we need to demand a change. The issue, or the head, in this instance, is legislation. We have become numb to what we allow our politicians do without regard to how it impacts the nation.

Question 1: In your response to your peers, consider how well they justified their positions, making use of available resources. Consider the following questions in your response posts:

Did they support their position convincingly with appropriate resources?
Which of their points make the most sense to you, even if you made a case for the opposing viewpoint?

Reference no: EM133487342

Questions Cloud

What would be the plot of your show : What would be the plot of your show and What would be the purpose of the program? Why is this a significant issue for you

Differentiate between the federal and state court systems : Differentiate between the federal and state court systems by describing three main differences between the two court systems. In your opinion

Discuss what the use of this clothing or gear is specific : Discuss what the use of this clothing or gear is specific to a type of weather/season permits you to DO. Does it 'spark joy'? (why/why not?)

What are some initial diagnostic thoughts for steven : What are some initial diagnostic thoughts for Steven? Discuss how you would formulate a differential diagnosis assessment of Steven.

Did they support their position convincingly with : Did they support their position convincingly with appropriate resources? Which of their points make the most sense to you, even if you made a case for

Explain five most important take-aways : Explain five most important take-aways, especially about whataboutism, from this article and WHY. Be very clear in your responses as to what is the takeaway.

Explain which funding mechanism states prefer : Describe block grants, categorical grants, and unfunded mandates. How do they demonstrate fiscal federalism? Explain which funding mechanism states prefer

What is your position on diversity in the workplace : Discuss what is your position on diversity in the workplace? How would you describe your attitude toward diversity? Be detailed in your analysis.

How can they be applied to business : The topic is What are the virtues according to Aristotle, and how can they be applied to business?

User Account

All Pages