Reference no: EM133683877
Summary and Analysis of the Case of former boxer Felix Verdejo for the femicide of Keishla Rodríguez that made headlines in the world press and document them according to the following scheme. whatever applies.
I. Name of the parties to the case, quote and issue addressed (e.g. People v. Juan Sutano, 156 D.P.R. 549 (2002) - Duties of the Magistrate
II. Relevant Facts: Not all facts are relevant. Identify the facts relevant to the controversy and the topic to be discussed.
III. Controversy: This is the core issue that the Supreme Court is resolving.
IV. Brief response to the controversy: Short response to the controversy that the Supreme Court is resolving.
V. Analysis of the Controversy - It is the reasoning that the Supreme Court uses to reach the conclusion.
SAW. Conclusion - It is the disposition of the case.
VII. Dissenting opinion - These are the opinions of Judges who do not agree with the majority of the judges (it is identified as a dissenting opinion, if it exists). This should be summarized as briefly as possible.
VIII. Analysis and Opinion - In this section you must provide an analysis or opinion of the ruling by the Supreme Court on the selected case of no more than two pages. You can use the following guiding questions, but they are not mandatory:
to. Is the controversy adequately framed according to the facts?
b. Did the court correctly resolve the dispute? Cause Yes or not? Explain.
c. Do you agree with the court's conclusion? Cause Yes or not? Explain.
d. How does the decision in this case, whether positive or negatively, the criminal procedure in Puerto Rico?
e. Personal reflection about the case from the forensic investigation perspective.