Presentation, structure, quality of the Business Change Proposal The quality of the proposal does not meet formatting expectations and is lacking report structure; it is difficult read it and follow arguments presented. Lot of grammatical and spelling mistakes. Information is not referenced; referencing style is not used. Overall the report meets expectations, however, the quality is poor; a number of grammatical and spelling mistakes; some information is not referenced; fair a bit of plagiarized information. The report meets expectations, overall the quality of the report is good, structure, flow of information, good presented arguments. Appropriate referencing. However, a few grammatical and spelling errors, minor errors in referencing and reference style used. The report is well presented; well written, well structured, information is presented clearly and in a logical manner. Good examples and explanations are used. All information is referenced. The report is exceptionally well presented; well written, well structured, information is presented clearly and in a logical manner.

Recommendations for further development Student did not develop recommendations for further development of SBC, how to monitor the external environment and find new business opportunities for growth. Student provided some recommendations for further development of SBC, briefly discussed how to monitor the external environment and find new business opportunities for growth at SBC. Student provided a few recommendations for further development of SBC and sufficiently discussed how to monitor the external environment and find new business opportunities. Student provided a number of recommendations for further development of SBC and discussed in details how to monitor the external environment and find new business opportunities. Student provided a great number of excellent recommendations for further development of SBC and discussed in great details how to monitor the external environment and find new business opportunities for growth.

Action Plan Student did not develop and discuss an implementation plan / Action Plan and did not identify timeline, budget, and resources requirements. Student developed and briefly discussed an implementation plan / Action Plan presenting a simple timeline, budget, and resources requirements. Student developed and sufficiently discussed an implementation plan / Action Plan presenting timeline, and briefly discussing budget, and resources requirements. Student developed and discussed in details an implementation plan / Action Plan presenting timeline, discussing budget, and resources requirements in details. Student developed and discussed in great details an implementation plan / Action Plan presenting timeline, discussing budget, and resources requirements in great details.

Likely problems of implementation of the alternative (Plan B) risk control procedure Student did not discuss implementation of any Plan B risk control procedure, how they are going to be implemented, and what likely problems and resistance may occur. Student briefly discussed implementation of a few Plan B risk control procedures, how they are going to be implemented, and some likely problems and resistance that may occur. Student discussed implementation of most of the Plan B risk control procedures in sufficient details, how they are going to be implemented, and the most obvious problems and resistance that may occur. Student discussed implementation of all of the Plan B risk control procedures in details, how they are going to be implemented, and a number of obvious problems and resistance that may occur during implementation phase. Student discussed implementation of all of the Plan B risk control procedures in great details, how they are going to be implemented, and provided a great number of a wide range of problems and resistance that may occur during implementation.

Alternative risk control procedures (Plan B) Student did not develop any alternative risk control procedure (Plan B) for dealing with / treating each risk that could be put in place if your original plan (Plan A) does not work. Student has developed some alternative risk control procedures (Plan B) for dealing with / treating each risk, however, they are not supported by literature review and real-world examples, case studies, and business reports. Student has developed a few alternative risk control procedures (Plan B) for dealing with / treating each risk; some of them are supported by literature review and real-world examples, case studies, and business reports. Student has developed a number of alternative risk control procedures (Plan B) for dealing with / treating each risk; most of the suggestions are supported by literature review and real-world examples, case studies, and business reports. Student has developed a great number of alternative risk control procedures (Plan B)

Likely problems of implementation of risk control procedure Student did not discuss implementation of any risk control procedure, how they are going to be implemented, and what likely problems and resistance may occur. Student briefly discussed implementation of a few risk control procedures, how they are going to be implemented, and some likely problems and resistance that may occur. Student discussed implementation of most of the risk control procedures in sufficient details, how they are going to be implemented, and the most obvious problems and resistance that may occur. Student discussed implementation of all of the risk control procedures in details, how they are going to be implemented, and a number of obvious problems and resistance that may occur during implementation phase. Student discussed implementation of all of the risk control procedures in great details, how they are going to be implemented, and provided a great number of a wide range of problems and resistance that may occur during implementation.

Risk assessment matrix; prioritisation of all hazards and risks Student did not develop risk assessment matrix and did not prioritise all hazards and risks identified based on urgency. Student developed risk assessment matrix and prioritised all hazards and risks identified based on urgency, however, did not provide any explanation. Student developed risk assessment matrix and prioritised all hazards and risks identified based on urgency; some explanation and justification is provided. Student developed risk assessment matrix and prioritised all hazards and risks identified based on urgency; good explanation and justification is provided. Student developed risk assessment matrix and prioritised all hazards and risks identified based on urgency; very good explanation and justification is provided.

Risk assessment and Risk management analysis Student did not conduct any risk assessment and risk management analysis. Student conducted risk assessment and risk management analysis and briefly explained the procedures for assessing the likely levels for each risk present at the business described in the case scenario. and risk management analysis and explained, in sufficient details, the procedures for assessing the likely levels for each risk present at the business described in the case scenario. Student conducted risk assessment and risk management analysis and explained, in details, the procedures for assessing the likely levels for each risk present at the business described in the case scenario. risk assessment and risk management analysis and explained, in great details, the procedures for assessing the likely levels for each risk present at the business described in the case scenario.

Background research - legislation and compliance requirements Student did not conduct any background research in regards to the legislation and compliance requirements applicable to the business described in the case scenario. Student conducted some background research and identified relevant legislations and compliance requirements applicable to the business described in the case scenario, however, they are not sufficiently explained. Student conducted good background research and identified relevant legislations and compliance requirements applicable to the business described in the case scenario; sufficient explanation of the requirements is provided. Student conducted very good background research and identified all relevant legislations and compliance requirements applicable to the business described in the case scenario; good explanation of the requirements is provided. Student conducted comprehensive background research and identified all relevant legislations and compliance requirements applicable to the business described in the case scenario; detailed explanation of the requirements is provided.

Hazards and Risks Student has not conducted sufficient analysis of the presented case scenario and did not identify most of present hazards and risks. Student has conducted sufficient analysis of the presented case scenario and identified most of the present hazards and risks, however, described them very briefly only. Student has conducted good analysis of the presented case scenario and identified most of the present hazards and risks, which are described in sufficient details. Student has conducted very good analysis of the presented case scenario and identified all present hazards and risks. The identified hazards and risks are described in details. Student has conducted comprehensive analysis of the presented case scenario and identified all present hazards and risks. The identified hazards and risks are described in great details.

Background information, Objectives, Scope and limitations Not sufficient background information is provided in regards to the business and its operational hazards and risks. Sufficient background information is provided in regards to the business and its major categories of hazards and risks are briefly discussed. Objectives, scope and limitations of the change proposal are briefly discussed. Good background information is provided in regards to the business; major categories of hazards and risks are sufficiently discussed. Objectives, scope and limitations of the change proposal are discussed. Very good background information is provided in regards to the business; major categories of hazards and risks are discussed in details. Objectives, scope and limitations of the change proposal are discussed in details. Excellent background information is provided in regards to the business; major categories of hazards and risks are discussed in great details. Objectives, scope and limitations of the change proposal are discussed in great details.

F P C D HD Executive summary This section is not covered in the submitted business change proposal / or is not discussed in sufficient details. Executive summary is more like an introduction, however, major points are briefly covered. Satisfactory executive summary. Scope and limitation of the report is discussed in sufficient details. Very good executive summary that summarises all relevant points of the change proposal. Scope and limitations of the report are well discussed. Excellent executive summary that well- summarises all key points of the change plan. Scope and limitations of the report are discussed in details; it is very clear what is and what is not covered in the report. C R I T E R I A G R A D E S

I need help to make this assignment. I only want you to do PART2. I am sending you some slides regarding the case study, thanks. This is a Bachelor level assignment and you will also be marked on: • overall presentation of the report (e.g. formatting, cover page, table of context, etc.) • structure of the report (e.g. headings used, logical and intuitive flow of information, etc.) • quality of the report (e.g. language used, arguments presented and discussed, etc.) • Conclusion of the report (e.g. succinct summary of the presented information and a brief conclusion, recommendations for the future, etc.) • referencing (use of external information sources, quality, validity of the data presented, relevance of the information presented, consistency of a reference style, etc.)