Excellent 1 till now as per the expectation I got very Good marks so please provide this kind of solution. Awesome Job. Submitted by deadline and received great scores too. Surely recommend to all students

5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) No submission. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) No submission. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) No submission. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction No submission. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Non-credible sources are used. Thoughts are orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Thoughts show logical progression. There is a smooth progression from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear thoughts presented in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose No submission. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

40.0 %Recommendations No submission. Analysis fails to identify recommendations from practice guide. Weak summary of chosen practices to be incorporated into teaching practices with little rationalization. Inadequate analysis of recommendations from practice guide provided. Insufficient summary of chosen practices to be incorporated into teaching practices with basic rationalization also provided. Adequate analysis of recommendations from practice guide provided. Sufficient summary of chosen practices to be incorporated into teaching practices with clear rationalization also provided. Comprehensive analysis of recommendations from practice guide provided. Thorough summary of chosen practices to be incorporated into teaching practices with clear, concise rationalization also provided.

Assignment 2 Rubric: Reading Comprehension Research Paper 1 No Evidence 0.00% 2 Nominal Evidence 69.00% 3 Unacceptable Evidence 74.00% 4 Acceptable Evidence 87.00% 5 Target Evidence 100.00% 100.0 %Criteria 30.0 %Critical Reading Areas No submission. Summary fails to identify and explain three reading areas critical to building young student's capacity to comprehend literature is provided. Inadequate summary of three reading areas critical to building young student's capacity to comprehend literature is provided. Evaluation somewhat supported by research. Adequate summary of three reading areas critical to building young student's capacity to comprehend literature is provided. Evaluation supported by research. Comprehensive, professional summary of three reading areas critical to building young student's capacity to comprehend literature is provided. Evaluation clearly supported by research.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) No submission. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

45.0 %Application of Conclusions to Practice [InTASC: 5, 9; CEC 3, 6] No submission. Responses on applying conclusions to practice is not related to assignment or not submitted. Responses on applying conclusions to practice is unclear or under-developed. Application of conclusions drawn reflects growth and development as a professional. Application of conclusions drawn reflects growth and development as a professional with an awareness of the needs of students, parents, and community

Assignment 1 Rubric: Field Experience B: Application of Content 1 No Evidence 0.00% 2 Nominal Evidence 69.00% 3 Unacceptable Evidence 74.00% 4 Acceptable Evidence 87.00% 5 Target Evidence 100.00% 100.0 %CRITERIA 50.0 %Reflections on Application of Content [InTASC: 5; CEC 3] No submission. Reflections are not related to the assignment or not submitted. Reflection does not apply knowledge, skills, and/or tools across concepts and/or content areas to engage students in critical thinking and/or problem solving on local and/or global issues in an acceptable manner. Reflects on applying knowledge, skills, and tools across concepts and content areas to engage students in critical thinking and problem solving on local and global issues in an acceptable manner. Reflects on applying knowledge, skills, and tools across concepts and content areas to engage students in critical thinking and problem solving on local and global issues in an acceptable manner.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.