Reference no: EM131332508 , Length:
Aims of Module:
1. To raise students' awareness of the growing importance and applications of specialist forensic disciplines within serious crime investigation.
2. To develop an understanding of the principles and provide practical experience of the techniques involved in a range of specialist forensic disciplines.
3. To encourage students' application of pre-existing scientific/ technical knowledge in the forensic investigation of specialist disciplines.
4. To enable the student to critically evaluate the forensic evidence available from case studies
Essay Title
With regard to the evaluation of forensic evidence, critically compare and contrast the value of different evidence types in addressing source and activity level propositions?
Give examples of how these evidence types may complement each other within a particular framework of case circumstances?
Your answers should refer to data relating to published studies regarding the evidence types in question. Use brief descriptions of case studies to illustrate/ exemplify your arguments.
Word Count should be 1200 words
All references should be in Harvard style
5 peer-reviewed journals are needed in total
2 Journals have been provided for you.
3 Journals you include should be as recently published as possible
Article 1 - A hierarchv of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework by R COOK, IW EVETT, G JACKSON, PJ JONES and JA LAMBERT
Article 2 - A model for case assessment and interpretation R COOK and IW EVETT G JACKSON and PJ JONES and JA LAMBERT
|
How michael would respond if he had to cut
: Michael, very surprised, responds that he does not use any "fudge factor" and that all his figures are honest. Ms. Jones counters by asking him how he would respond if he had to cut about 20% from his budget as it is.
|
|
Generalizes aumanns agreement theorem to a set of players
: Given an Aumann model of incomplete information with beliefs (N, Y, (Fi)i∈N , s, P) with n players, suppose that for each i ∈ N, the fact that player i describes probability qi to an event A is common knowledge among the players. Prove that q1 = q..
|
|
Assumptions for performing an anova
: The data is shown in the following table. List each of the assumptions for performing an ANOVA and for each assumption evaluate whether the described study meets the assumption.
|
|
Discuss the effectiveness of confederate blockade-runners
: Discuss the effectiveness of the Confederate blockade-runners and why they were able to sustain the Confederacy until late in the Civil War.Please list the statement above, and then write your response to the statement in your submitted homework a..
|
|
Develop an understanding of the principles
: CS0616: Advanced Forensic Investigation - develop an understanding of the principles and provide practical experience of the techniques involved in a range of specialist forensic disciplines.
|
|
Depict situation as harsanyi model of incomplete information
: Depict the situation as a Harsanyi model of incomplete information, where a player's type is the color of his hat, and specify the vector of types corresponding to the true situation.
|
|
Discuss trends for the overall sector of your company
: Discuss trends for the overall SECTOR of your company - revenue, margin and earnings. Discuss the balance sheet and valuation ratios of interest for this sector.
|
|
What is probability that player ii describes to the event a
: Suppose that Player I announces the probability you calculated in item above. How will that affect the probability that Player II now describes to the event A?
|
|
What is the future of the middle east
: We discussed Syria, Lebanon, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, the Maghreb (Algeria, Tunisia, and Morocco), along with terrorist groups ISIS, Al Qaeda, and the Taliban. How do you characterize the stability of each nation? For each, provide a brief synopsis of ..
|