Reference no: EM132356515

Systems Thinking for Organizational Improvement Assignment -

Overview - In this Performance Task Assessment, you will analyze multiple case studies in order to demonstrate your ability to apply systems components, modeling, leverage points, and interventions to improve system performance systems.

Instructions - Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the assessor will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.

Access the following to complete this Assessment:

• Opportunity Consultants, Inc., Case Study
• Baria Planning Solutions Case Study
• Facilitating Systemic Thinking in Business Classes
• Bayonne Packaging, Inc., Case Study
• Problem Identification - Simple Gap Analysis and the 5-Whys
• How to Use the 5-Whys for Root Cause Analysis
• Tree Diagram Example
• Causal Loop Diagrams
• The System Archetypes
• Academic Writing Expectations Checklist

This assessment has four-parts. Click each of the items below to complete this assessment.

Part I: Laws of the Fifth Discipline and the Value of Systems Thinking

Read the scenario as well as the Introduction and Chapter 1 of the Meadows text, the Cathon article on the Learning Organization, the Zemke article on Systems Thinking, and the other material required, and then respond to the prompts that follow.

Scenario - As an expert in systems analysis, you've received an e-mail from the chief financial officer (CFO) of XYZ Manufacturers to discuss a potential consulting project. The CFO is vaguely familiar with the concept of systems thinking but isn't sure it could be successfully applied to her fast-paced, global business.

• Based on your knowledge of systems thinking and the learning organization, reply to the CFO's inquiry by explaining at least three challenges of managing complex organizations and how and why effective systems thinking can help improve their performance. Support your response and reasoning with explicit and appropriate references to the readings and with at least two other theoretical frameworks or academic references about systems thinking and practice. (2 -3 paragraphs)
• Having learned about systems thinking and the learning organization, and reviewed at least one other theoretical framework or academic reference about general systems thinking and practice, give at least two examples, from your experiences in organizations, in which the application of systems thinking could have helped the organization become more effective. Be clear in explaining which specific principles and concepts from systems thinking could have helped in the examples you choose, and explain how and why. (4 - 5 paragraphs)

Part II: Gap Analysis Using the 5-Whys

Read the "Opportunity Consultants, Inc., Case Study" and then respond to the following prompts:

• Using a systems approach, analyze the performance of Opportunity Consultants, Inc. and develop a case-specific "effect-cause-effect logic" tree diagram using the 5-Whys analytic tool. See the Rubric for details on what this diagram should contain.
• Write a summary description of your diagram with specific recommendations for improving the club's performance that is linked to your diagram analysis. (1-2 pages)

Part III: Gap Analysis With Causal Loop Modeling

Read the "Baria Planning Solutions Case Study" and "Facilitating Systemic Thinking in Business Classes" documents, and then respond to the following prompts:

• Using a formal system diagramming approach, analyze Baria's performance and develop a robust "effect-cause-effect logic" tree diagram using the 5-Whys tool, as in Part One.
• Create an appropriate, simple causal loop diagram (CLD) that incorporates relevant and logical feedback loops to capture the fundamental system behaviours, outcomes, and causes in the "Baria Planning Solutions Case Study." See the Rubric for details on what this diagram should contain.
• Write a summary description, including specific recommendations, that links directly to your 5-Whys and CLD analyses for improving Baria's sales support operations and organization as a whole. (1-2 pages)

Part IV: Robust Causal Loop Modeling

Read the "Bayonne Packaging, Inc., Case Study" and "The System Archetypes" documents, and then respond to the following prompts:

• Using a formal system diagramming approach, analyze Bayonne's organizational performance and develop a robust "effect-cause-effect logic" tree diagram using the 5-Whys tool, as in Part One.
• Create a robust causal loop diagram (CLD) that incorporates appropriate causal loop logic in the analysis and that also identifies common system archetype patterns within the diagram. This diagram should describe the fundamental system of behaviors and outcomes.
• Write a summary description, including specific recommendations, that links directly to your CLD analysis (which includes embedded archetype relationships) for improving the packaging company's operations and the organization as a whole. (1-2 pages)

Systems Thinking for Organizational Improvement: Apply systems components, modeling, leverage points, and interventions to improve system performance systems.

Part I: Laws of the Fifth Discipline and the Value of Systems Thinking

Sub-Competency 1: Explain how the Laws of the Fifth Discipline and effective systems thinking can lead to organizational improvement.

Learning Objective 1.1: Explain the challenges of managing complex organizations and how effective systems thinking can help improve their performance.

Learning Objective 1.2: Explain how the Laws of the Fifth Discipline and general systems thinking could have helped organizations in real-world business situations.

Part II: Gap Analysis Using the 5-Whys

Sub-Competency 2: Describe the effective use of, and appropriately apply, the basic tools of systems thinking, including simple gap analysis (using the 5-Whys tool), basic causal loop modeling, archetype analysis, and leverage point analysis.

Learning Objective 2.1: Produce a robust "effect-cause-effect logic" tree diagram using the 5-Whys analytic tool for a given case study.

Learning Objective 2.2: Describe specific recommendations for improving an organization's performance, based on the effect-cause-effect 5-Whys analysis.

Part III: Gap Analysis With Causal Loop Modeling

Learning Objective 2.3: Produce a robust "effect-cause-effect logic" tree diagram using the 5-Whys analytic tool for a given case study.

Learning Objective 2.4: Produce a simple causal loop diagram (CLD) that integrates and displays the fundamental elements identified in the 5- Whys gap analysis for a given case study.

Learning Objective 2.5: Describe specific recommendations for improving an organization's performance, based on both the effect-cause- effect 5-Whys analysis and the simple causal loop diagram (CLD) analysis.

Part IV: Robust Causal Loop Modeling

Sub-Competency 3: Apply robust causal loop systems diagrams and supporting recommendations that build on archetype and leverage point analyses and that address fundamental system behaviors and outcomes.

Learning Objective 3.1: Produce a robust "effect-cause-effect logic" tree diagram using the 5-Whys analytic tool for a given case study.

Learning Objective 3.2: Produce a complex causal loop diagram (CLD) that Integrates and displays the fundamental elements identified in the 5- Whys gap analysis and that clearly identifies and incorporates archetype causal loops in the analysis of a given case study.

Learning Objective 3.3: Describe specific recommendations for improving an organization's performance, based on both the effect-cause- effect 5-Whys analysis and the complex causal loop diagrams (CLD) with archetype analysis.

Attachment:- Organizational Improvement Assignment Files.rar