This work was well written, plan, structure and layout were clear for the reader. Well written assignment. This work achieved a distinction. The Expert followed the marking guide and assignment requirements. well written

ohk thanks. I am uploading all the material here. This material should be used for this assignment and the next assignment which i will upload after its completion Here is my study material. Take the main points and theories from these and use some in the assignment. 25003924_1Module 1.docx 25003942_2Module 2.docx 25003917_3Module 3.docx topics like kraljic's matrix, bulwhip effect are important and can be used in the assignment 25003991_1Module 4.docx In this assignment if there is any doubt at any point, please feel free to leave a message as this assignment is very crucial I think you are right. In think the calculations here referred is in regards to kraljic's matrix. Read Module 2 and i think you will find something about it

Please assign a good expert on this as EM2079SHI513BM_1. he did a good job. Please take care of all the details and references. If this assignment also made perfect then you can expect many more work from my side and from my friends. Please take care of plagrism and quality. I am regular as i have spend more than $1700 here already. just i want to be assured of the best expert on this one too. I will pay this amount, i just want this assignment to be made in conjecture to my online study material of this subject as well. For that what can we do? Should i upload all the study material here or should i tell you the main topics covered in this subject so that some of the learning outcomes and theories from the subject can be used here as well

Writing and ? Excellent use of relevant and ? Very good use of relevant and ? Good use of relevant and ? Fair use of relevant ? Few if any literature sources referencing appropriate sources of literature appropriate sources of literature appropriate sources of sources of literature (two included and poor standard of (more than three academic (three academic references). literature (three academic academic references). Some referencing. Poor spelling and (10% of total mark) references). Correct referencing used throughout. Excellent grammar Correct referencing, and very good grammar and spelling. references). Mostly correct referencing. Good grammar and spelling. referencing errors. Some grammar and spelling errors. grammar. and spelling. (8-10 marks) (7 marks) (6 marks) (5 marks) (< 5 marks)

CRITERIA Excellent (> 80 %) Very good (70 – 79%) Good (60 – 69%) Acceptable (50 – 59%) Unacceptable (<50%) Structure of ? Report uses excellent ? Report uses good structure, including most or all of: ? Poor structure throughout, with poor flow of information. report structure, including an Executive Executive Summary, Table of Contents, and relevant information Summary, Table of Contents, in an Appendix. (5% of total mark) and relevant information in an Appendix. Excellent flow of information. Good flow of information. (5 marks) (3-4 marks) (<3 marks)

Critical analysis ? Introduces ideas and ? Introduces ideas and ? Introduces most ideas and ? Makes a fair attempt at ? Ideas are not presented concepts clearly and logically, concepts clearly, demonstrating concepts clearly, introducing ideas clearly. clearly, demonstrating little or (25% of total mark) demonstrating a deep understanding of the material covered. Justifies all arguments with a good understanding of the material covered. Justifies most arguments with reference to the relevant demonstrating a good understanding of the material covered. Makes a good attempt at Poor or missing justification of arguments with reference to relevant theories and concepts. no understanding of the material covered. Little or no attempt to refer to relevant theories and reference to the relevant theories and concepts. justifying arguments with concepts. theories and concepts. reference to relevant (21-25 marks) (18-20 marks) theories and concepts. (15-17 marks) (13-14 marks) (<12 marks) (CONTINUED OVER PAGE…)

AusCotton ? Correctly identifies, explains ? Correctly identifies and ? Correctly identifies and ? Provides a fair attempt at ? Provides little or no attempt Clothing report: response to questions posed and discusses global and ethical issues relevant for strategic sourcing. explains global and ethical issues relevant for strategic sourcing. explains some of the global and ethical issues relevant for strategic sourcing. identifying some global and ethical issues relevant for strategic sourcing. at identifying relevant global and ethical issues. Recommendations missing or Makes concise and appropriate Makes concise and appropriate Makes appropriate Makes a fair attempt at of poor standard. (30% of total recommendations for recommendations for recommendations for appropriate mark) improvements. improvements. improvements. recommendations for improvements. (24-30 marks) (21-23 marks) (18-20 marks) (15-17 marks) (<15 marks)

CRITERIA Excellent (> 80 %) Very good (70 – 79%) Sapphire Energy ? Provides an insightful and ? Provides an accurate report: response to questions posed (30% of total mark) accurate evaluation of the current system, based on rigorous and in-depth research. Includes correct and accurate calculations. Makes concise and appropriate evaluation of the current system, based on solid and in-depth research. Includes correct and accurate calculations. Makes concise and appropriate recommendations for recommendations for improvements. improvements. (24-30 marks) (21-23 marks)

required 15 academy of management referencing style. turnitin report is must. Assignment should be made according to rubrik only. MGT5PSC: Assessment 2 marking rubric Good (60 – 69%) Acceptable (50 – 59%) Unacceptable (<50%) ? Provides a good ? Provides a fair evaluation ? Provides little or no evaluation of the current system, based on research. Includes correct calculations. Makes appropriate recommendations for improvements. of the current system. Makes a fair attempt at appropriate recommendations for improvements. evaluation of the current system. Calculations incorrect or missing. Recommendations missing or of poor standard.