Reference no: EM133749850
Project Risk and Quality
Overview
In this assignment, you will work in groups of 3-4 to analyse and present on project risk management approaches in a specific industry sector. Your task is to explore how uncertainty (project risk) is addressed and how different project management methodologies influence project success, with a focus on risk
management.
Case Study: Boola Katijin
Boola Katitjin, an award-winning academic building at Murdoch University in Perth, Western Australia, exemplifies modern, sustainable design and innovative teaching technology. The building integrates biophilic design principles, extensive use of Mass Engineered Timber (MET), and advanced digital technologies, including Technology Enabled Learning (TEL) desks. It aims to enhance student well-being and learning experiences while achieving a Six Star Green Star rating for sustainability.
Objective
Analyse the project risk management strategies employed in the construction of Boola Katitjin, the academic building at Murdoch University in Perth, Western Australia.
Group Task
In your groups, examine the project risk management aspects of Boola Katitjin, addressing the following learning outcomes:
1. Communication: Demonstrate how complex project management knowledge was communicated to diverse stakeholders throughout the project.
2. Uncertainty Assessment: Evaluate how uncertainty was identified and addressed using professional global standards and guides.
3. Risk Management Approaches: Analyse the effectiveness of predictive, hybrid, and adaptive project risk management approaches used in the project.
4. Strategic and Operational Drivers: Assess the strategic and operational factors that influenced the project's approach to uncertainty and risk management.
Key Areas to Consider
Sustainability goals and their impact on risk management
Integration of innovative technologies (e.g., TEL desks) and associated risks
Stakeholder engagement strategies
Construction challenges and mitigation measures
Application of global risk management standards
Deliverables
A table containing at least 5 research findings related to the case study per student, making a total of 20 entries for the table. This information will used as the basis for the presentation that follows.
A 12-minute total group P.anopto video presentation summarising key findings. Each person must deliver a 4-minute presentation outlining their individual findings, delivered as a single, logical and coherent presentation that addresses the learning outcomes, assignment brief and aligns with the marking rubric.
Assessment Criteria
Depth of analysis and critical thinking
Application of project risk management theories and concepts
Quality of research and use of relevant sources
Clarity of communication in both written and oral formats
Teamwork and equal contribution from all group members
NOTE: Remember to cite all sources used (including the information gathered from generative Al systems) appropriately following APA 7th protocols and maintain
academic integrity throughout your work.
STEP 1. BEFORE YOU START
Read these instructions carefully before you start preparing your assignment:
1. Refer to the following document which outline the key elements of the assignment that you need to address as outputs of the assignment:
Assignment brief
Unit materials
Unit texts
Output: Develop a high-level conceptual overview of the assignment deliverables based on the supplied material listed above.
Output: Develop a high-level conceptual overview of the assignment deliverables based on the supplied material listed above.
Assignment Preparation
STEP 2. Research
Academic Sources: Scholarly databases, peer reviewed journals, industry publications, grey literature, course texts and notes.
Case: Each group member will research a different theme of project risk management in your assigned project case study. Responsibility for each theme must be agreed upon by all group members, who will sign a project charter and submit this document to their designated group area in Canvas If your group only has less than FOUR members, all the themes should be divided up equally among all members of the group. All themes must be included and cited according to APA 7th protocols. A peer review form will be completed by all group members at the end of the assignment indicating the contribution that each of the individual member of the group has made, and this should be supported by evidence to support the claims. Marks will be adjusted based on the contribution made by each group member.
Case Study Themes:
Key project risks in the case study
Traditional/predictive risk management approaches applicable to the case study
Project risk identification methodologies
Project risk treatment and control
STEP 3. Case Study Analysis
Academic Usage: Scholarly databases, peer reviewed journals, industry publications, grey literature, course