Presentation Skills Regular/constant eye contact, The audience was engaged, and presenters held the audience’s attention. Appropriate speaking volume & body language. Most members spoke to majority of audience; steady eye contact. The audience was engaged by the presentation. Majority of presenters spoke at a suitable volume. Some fidgeting by member(s). Content The presentation was a concise summary of the topic with all questions answered. Comprehensive and complete coverage of information. The presentation was a good summary of the topic. Most important information covered; little irrelevant info. Preparedness/ Participation/ Group Dynamics All presenters knew the information, participated equally, and helped each other as needed. Extremely prepared and rehearsed. Slight domination of one presenter. Members helped each other. Very well prepared.

Presentation Marking Rubric (Group) 2 1.50 1.25 1 Mark Visual Appeal There are no errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Information is clear and concise on each slide. Visually appealing/engaging. There are some errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Too much information on two or more slides. Significant visual appeal. There are many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Too much information was contained on many slides. Minimal effort made to make slides appealing or too much going on. There are many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. The slides were difficult to read and too much information had been copied onto them. No visual appeal. Comprehension Extensive knowledge of topic. Members showed complete understanding of assignment. Accurately answered all questions posed. Most showed a good understanding of topic. All members able to answer most of audience questions. Few members showed good understanding of some parts of topic. Only some members accurately answered questions. Presenters didn’t understand topic. Majority of questions answered by only one member or majority of information incorrect.

3. Organizational resources and sustainable Competitive advantage. Exceptionally well- presented and argued. Ideas are detailed, well- developed, supported with specific evidence and facts, as well as in-depth analysis. 4. Planning for New Specific details on planning for new products, products, New product product development process and clear development process and discussion and in-depth analysis of competing competing through new through new marketing mix marketing mix 5. Overall organizations. Well-planned, logically-flowing and well-thought out. References and Formatting Includes range of legitimate references (internet, articles, quotations, books and journals etc.). Correct use of referencing and citation using APA style.

Category Excellent 3 Marks 1. Executive Summary Comprehensive and concise summary of the reports, major purpose, analytical process the findings and the recommendations 2. New Product Selection – Product Info Exceptionally well- presented- detailed description of product selected including: - general information - picture of product - format of sales (ex. How many units per package).