Discussion The evaluation lacks a critical perspective, does not have a business focus, evidence based approach and does not relates theory to practice. There has been little attempt made to discuss ‘engagement’ in a meaningful way, if at all. Recommendations Inappropriate recommendations have been offered, that may be incapable of implementation, or be unethical. Recommendations (if at all made) are platitudes focused on what “they” should do or should not do, unsupported by any convincing justification or persuasive rationale that might otherwise have led “them”

Mark Band: 35-39 (Marginal Fail)and Mark Band 1-34% (Fail) Literature Review The student demonstrates a poor understanding of the knowledge of alternative definitions of ‘engagement’ or may fail to recognise differences. A poor knowledge of the subject matter and a poor analysis which fails to contrast similar concepts (or does so superficially) such as ‘involvement’, ‘participation’ and ‘commitment’ is demonstrated. Student demonstrates poor or no knowledge and analysis of behaviours and evidential signs for engagement such as organisational citizenship and discretionary behaviour and the differences between engagement, non-engagement and disengagement are not evident. The student undertakes a poor critical review of the research linking engagement with organisational behaviour. No attempt or a weak attempt to analyse problems with identifying cause-effect relationships is evident. Weak attempts have been made to disentangle the reality from the rhetoric, if at all.Little if at all any evidence based argument is demonstrated illustrating a weak or non-existent understanding of theory and/or organisational practice.

Discussion The evaluation is adequate, adopts a descriptive approach and largely relates any theory used to practice in a superficial and descriptive application to a specific organisation. Recommendations Some recommendations have been offered but may be loosely based on some evaluation and analysis. Recommendations are adequate and may be just about capable of some attempts at implementation in this organisational context. Presentation and Persuasion The assignment is of an adequate standard. Concepts are not always expressed in a clear and systematic manner. There is quite limited referencing.

Mark Band: 40-49% (Low Pass) Literature Review The student demonstrates adequate understanding of the knowledge of alternative definitions of ‘engagement’. Adequate knowledge of the subject matter and adequate attempts at description which may or may not identify similar concepts such as ‘involvement’, ‘participation’ and ‘commitment’ may be demonstrated.Adequate knowledge and analysis of behaviours and evidential signs for engagement such as organisational citizenship and discretionary behaviour may be adequately identified or demonstrated. The differences between engagement, non-engagement and disengagement may be identified or even adequately described. The student undertakes an adequate but highly descriptive review of the research linking engagement with organisational behaviour. Problems with identifying cause-effect relationships are may be evidenced, though significant gaps may exist. Adequate attempts may have been made to disentangle the reality from the rhetoric. Evidence based argument is quite narrowly demonstrated, illustrating adequate to threshold understanding of theory and/or organisational practice.

Discussion The evaluation is satisfactory, adopts a reasonably strategic and evidence based approach and largely relates theory to practice in assessing application to a specific organisation. Recommendations Relevant recommendations have been offered based on some evaluation and analysis. Recommendations are reasonable and may be capable of implementation in this organisational context. Presentation and Persuasion The assignment is of an acceptable standard. Concepts are expressed in a clear and systematic manner. There is acceptable, but limited referencing.

Mark Band: 50-59% (Satisfactory Pass) Literature Review The student demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the knowledge of alternative definitions of ‘engagement’. A satisfactory knowledge of the subject matter and a satisfactory analysis which contrasts similar concepts such as ‘involvement’, ‘participation’ and ‘commitment’ is reasonably demonstrated.Satisfactoryknowledge and analysis of behaviours and evidential signs for engagement such as organisational citizenship and discretionary behaviour is reasonably demonstrated. The differences between engagement, non-engagement and disengagement are reasonably analysed. The student undertakes a satisfactorybut descriptive review of the research linking engagement with organisational behaviour. Problems with identifying cause-effect relationships are evidenced, though gaps may exist. Attempts have been made to disentangle the reality from the rhetoric. Evidence based argument is reasonably demonstrated illustrating a satisfactory understanding of theory and/or organisational practice.

Discussion The evaluation is quite critical, adopts a strategic and evidence based approach and relates theory to practice in assessing application to a specific organisation. Recommendations Appropriate recommendations have been offered based on sound evaluation and analysis. Recommendations are capable of implementation in this organisational context. Presentation and Persuasion The assignment is of a good professional standard. Concepts are expressed with clarity in a convincing and cogent manner demonstrating effective written communication skills. There is appropriate referencing from a variety of relevant sources.

Mark Band: 60-69% (Commendable Pass) Literature Review Thisstudent demonstrates a good understanding of the knowledge of alternative definitions of ‘engagement’. The student demonstrates a good knowledge of the subject matter and a good analysis which contrasts similar concepts such as ‘involvement’, ‘participation’ and ‘commitment’. Behaviours and evidential signs for engagement such as organisational citizenship and discretionary behaviour have been critically analysed. Differences between engagement, non-engagement and disengagement have been analysed well. The student undertakes a good critical review of the research linking engagement with organisational behaviour. Problems with identifying cause-effect relationships are evaluated well with the reality disentangled from the rhetoric. Evidence based argument is demonstrated illustrating a good understanding of theory and/or organisational practice.

Discussion The evaluation is critical, adopts a strategic and evidence based approach and comprehensively relates theory to practice in assessing application to a specific organisation. Recommendations Highly appropriate recommendations have been offered based on comprehensive evaluation and analysis. The recommendations follow logically from the preceding literature, discussion and conclusions.Recommendations are fully capable of implementation in this organisational context. Presentation and Persuasion The assignment is of an excellent professional standard. Concepts are expressed with exceptional clarity in a convincing and cogent manner demonstrating highly effective written communication skills. There is extensive and appropriate referencing.

Mark Band: 70-100% (Outstanding/Excellent Pass) Literature Review This student demonstrates an excellent understanding of the knowledge of alternative definitions of ‘engagement’. The student demonstrates a comprehensive knowledge of the subject matter and a comprehensive analysis which contrasts similar concepts such as ‘involvement’, ‘participation’ and ‘commitment’. Behaviours and evidential signs for engagement such as organisational citizenship and discretionary behaviour have been comprehensively analysed. Differences between engagement, non-engagement and disengagement have been critically analysed. The student undertakes a comprehensive critical review of the research linking engagement with organisational behaviour, problems with identifying cause-effect relationships are comprehensively evaluated with the reality disentangled from the rhetoric.Evidence based argument is demonstrated throughout, illustrating an excellent understanding of theory and/or organisational practice.

Submission You should submit your report electronically via BREO Assignments on-line. Please submit in PDF or word document format. Assessment Criteria As illustrated on pages 4-5. Good Academic Practice Please see appendix A at the end of this brief for guidance on this issue.

University coversheet Include name, student ID number, unit title and code, assessment title, date of submission. Title page Title of your report. Address (to/from) and date the report. Contents Page Include page numbers. Introduction (Around 150 words). Short introduction to the report setting out what the aims and objectives of the report are, what the report will cover and why. You may want to provide a very brief overview of your organisation at this stage Reference List A list of the third-party sources you have consulted and which are cited directly in the text. All these sources should be properly identified. Harvard style (see the Learning Resources website: lrweb.beds.ac.uk/help/guide-to-ref). Appendices Lengthy appendices are not necessary and must be discouraged. You may include extra relevant background information (no more than a page) regarding your organisation if not already in the introduction.

I want to choose one big Company in Oman and write what they want in Assignment and I want this Assigment after 2 weeks or before . 1600 words +/-10 % Unit Name: Leading and Managing People Unit Code: SHR012-6 Title of Coursework: Assessment 1: Employee Engagement % weighting of final unit grade: 60%