Thank you for your work. Now you have made a good assignment. ExpertsMind has saved me once before and again doing a marvellous job, I highly recommend, they every time go out of their way to do their best. Thank you very much, appreciated. You are really so much supportive.

Hi, I need some changes in this assignment by tomorrow morning. pump assessment, we need the following changes in the solution 1- root cause, pls relate these tools with the case study ( don't need to describe the theory of tool, only explain what is this tool and relate with case study) also, attach figures or diagram(ex-fishbone) which prepared for solving the problem( you used theory diagram which explains tools) 2 - APA reference style. 3 - use relative assumptions and more than 4 compulsory. 4 - pls describe improvement by using tools please make sure that you make changes as per the requirement which I sent in the last message. and one extra thing that you had used this tools so now you have to show in the assignment that how these tools will be helpful in the improvement of problem. this is the main part which you didn't mention in the assignment so please change this. I am attaching lecture slides here so that you can have a look. and very important one thing that in actuality you have to use figure and diagram to explain that how these tools would be helpful to the case study. explain how these tools will be helpful to the case study.

Please make sure that you use easy language to understand and it should not be as same as PMbok. You must go through whole assignment description to understand assignment. Please make sure I need 30/40 marks to pass the unit. I need A+ grade. You must show evidence of using at least seven (7) tools and techniques that you have learnt from this unit to address question (i) above. You may refer to the Project Quality Management from PMBOK, PRINCE2 or any other quality management systems such as ISO9000 series, TQM (Total Quality Management), Six Sigma / Lean Six Sigma etc to devise your continuous improvement plan.

Your submission should be made using Microsoft Office documents and submitted as a separate 2,500 - 3,000 word Microsoft WORD document. Text beyond the 3000 word limit WILL NOT BE MARKED. Text length less than 2500 words will be penalised by 5% of the total available marks. Supporting diagrams / figures may be presented in other formats - Excel, PowerPoint slides, PDF documents, as part of the appendix and will not count towards the word limit. The reference list will also not be included in the word count. Tables shall be included in the word count.

Your submission should be a properly constructed to an academic standard. It should contain an effective introduction, body and conclusion. The body should present the justification to support your recommendations, provide your assumptions and finally, provide a conclusion that should restate your recommendations on a high level. The submission should contain a coherent, but necessarily restricted review of the academic literature on the project management topics in question. The literature review should be integrated into the, not a separate section. Do not include an executive summary or an abstract.

This assessment item involves researching your assigned topic to enhance your understanding of lean project management concepts and utilisation of academic literature. Whilst you use the recommended textbooks and lecture materials, you may also refer to relevant peer reviewed, academic journal articles. A reference list (comprising between 5 – 10 references) formatted in the prescribed APA style is compulsory. There is a clear but succinct introduction of the case study which includes all the relevant information. Describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. Seven (7) or more tools tools are correctly used to capture root causes. There is clear elaboration on the application of the chosen tools.

Demonstrates a clear and deep understanding of the major issues presented in the case. All the relevant problems are identified. Makes evident, appropriate and insightful connections between the problems. All the relevant actions are identified. Offers insightful and thorough analysis of all the actions. Makes evident, appropriate and insightful connections between the problems and corresponding actions. All the relevant resources are identified. Offers insightful and thorough analysis of all the resources. Makes evident, appropriate and insightful connections between the problems and corresponding actions and resources. Some follow up actions and status are provided. The suggested solutions are not only feasible to implement but also cost-effective for the organisation. Excellent clarity of expression at both the sentence and paragraph levels. Well-structured with logical flow of ideas between paragraphs. Citations and References fully comply with APA style.