I have my mental health assignment due I sent you the all the information, assignment need to be in APA style and APA in text referencing and also need to use a NANDA DIAGNOSIS need to pic 3 diagnosis and treat plan for these, actual word limit 1000, for the referencing the journals need to be Australian and most recent 4th or 6th edition. Please use a very simple wording because it need to be like my and also please let me know the price it is due is soon if can provide me your contact number would be great thank you.

References and use of literature (0 – 14 marks) Little or no literature cited. Literature not peer reviewed. Not contemporary. No evidence of knowledge of APA 6th conventions (15 – 18 marks) Evidence of ability to identify relevant literature Some literature cited – Attempt at APA 6th referencing (19 – 21 marks) Evidence of ability to source relevant literature Literature cited from a range of sources – clinical practice guidelines and evidence APA 6th referencing done well (22 – 25 marks) Evidence of a organized approach to literature searching and acquisition Literature cited from a range of quality resources Clinical practice guidelines and evidence Current APA 6th referencing done well (26 - 30% marks) Evidence of a structured approach to literature searching and acquisition Able to access high quality resources Both clinical practice guidelines that are current, Australian or internationally recognised Current presentation throughout paper APA referencing done well

Content and Knowledge (0 – 14 marks) Lack of knowledge about what nurses do – unable to provide evidence (15 – 19 marks) Generic treatments identified – Absence of critique of interventions Absence of lived experience perspectives about interventions Use of evidence (20 – 25 marks) Little evidence of ability to critique or weigh up interventions chosen. No evidence to support contention that nurses provide this intervention Use of evidence (26 – 31 marks) Some ability to critique interventions identified Some evidence of lived experience perspectives included Relevant to the case study chosen Use of evidence (32 - 40 marks) Understanding of consumer self-report tools Nursing directed interventions – provides rationale and critique Lived experience perspectives evidence Relevant to the person identified in the case study Use of research literature Use of text Use of clinical practice guidelines

Organisation of assignment according to criteria – 4 different sections to responses (0 – 4 marks) Did not answer question (5 marks) Able to identify 2 key areas Use of evidence to target case, diagnosis, biological, psychological, social (6 marks ) Able to identify to identify 2 key areas. Use of evidence to target areas , case, diagnosis, biological, psychological, social (7 marks) Able to identify 3 key areas for treatment Use of evidence to target areas - case, diagnosis, biological, psychological, social ( 8 - 10 marks) Able to identify 4 key areas of treatment Consumer directed, biological, psychological, social, use of evidence to target areas, case diagnosis

Unsatisfactory Below 50% Pass 50 – 59% Credit 60% - 69% Distinction 70% - 79% High Distinction 80% - 100% Presentation, and style (0 – 9 marks) No evidence of organisation Poor grammar, sentence structure and paragraph construction (10 – 11 marks) Some attempt at organisation apparent Not according to guideline Language understood – Grammar, sentence structure and paragraph able to be identified. Some grammar and writing errors evident (11– 12 marks) Organisation apparent – not according to guideline Language fluent Effective expression Grammar and spelling mainly accurate (13 - 15 marks) Organisation apparent – fits guidelines Grammar and spelling accurate (16 - 20 marks) Well organised assignment – fits guidelines set out according to subject guide, well written, grammar, sentence structure, paragraph clear

Nursing diagnoses identified and goals Assessment tools utilised Biological Expected outcome and evaluation tools Nursing diagnoses identified and goals Assessment tools utilised Psychological Expected outcome and evaluation tools Nursing diagnoses identified and goals Assessment tools utilised Social Expected outcome and evaluation tools

Demographic information – not included in word limit , age, gender, Description of the case -must be one of the following a person diagnosed with an eating disorder, personality disorder, somatoform disorder, dual diagnosis (alcohol and other drug and mental illness), or dual disability (learning or developmental disability) Setting of treatment – inpatient, community Over the next 3 months Biological, psychological, social intervention proposed and rationale Expected outcome and evaluation approach Consumer identified goals This part does not have to be filled out – it would be completed with the person What tools might assist the consumer to evaluate their own goals