Professional The report demonstrates: presentation • Accuracy and fluency in terms of academicwriting • A good flow of concepts with logical argument andsupport • Critical comment (not justdescription) • Excellent diagrams and tables are used (whererequired) • Academic sources and references used properly Excellent meets all the requirements for this section 9 – 10 Very Good work – meets most requirements Only minor issues or lapses 7 –8 Adequate work 5 – 6 Weak – does not meet the requirements 0 – 4 Marker’s comment: /10 Total /85

Reflection on overall business-case This section should provide insight into: • Unique business values of proposed cloud option with respect to the current IT landscape of the firm. • Recommendation – should reflect transformation impact, IT resource optimization and businessvalues. Excellent meets all the requirements for this section Insightful, well-illustratedand supported 9–10 Very Good work – meets most requirements Only minor issues orlapses 7–8 Adequate work – covers the ground Not much depth, illustration orsupportoffered 5 –6 Weak – does not meet the requirements Lacks depth or support attentiontodetail 0 – 4 Marker’s comment: /10

Validate your business case using ROI The business case validation provides insight into: • Cloud Return on Investment.(ROI) • Expected Quality of service(QoS) Excellent meets all the requirements for this section Insightful, well-illustrated and supported Very Good work – meets most requirements Only minor issues or lapses Adequate work – covers the ground Not much depth, illustration or support offered Weak – does not meet the requirements Lacks depth or support attention to detail Marker’s comment: 9 – 10 7 –8 5 –6 0 –4 /10

The costing, investment and strategic opportunities section demonstrate insight into: • Resolution of pain points in existing businessprocesses • Cost of managing Cloudenvironment • Transformationoptimization Excellent meets all the requirements for this section Insightful, well-illustratedand supported 9–10 Very Good work – meets most requirements Only minor issues orlapses 7–8 Adequate work – covers the ground Not much depth, illustration orsupportoffered 5 –6 Weak – does not meet the requirements Lacks depth or support attentiontodetail 0 – 4

The migration method provides insight into: • The methodology used to migrate to thecloud • Elements of risk and contingencies tomeet. Excellent meets all the requirements for this section Insightful, well-illustratedand supported 9–10 Very Good work – meets most requirements Only minor issues orlapses 7–8 Adequate work – covers the ground Not much depth, illustration orsupportoffered 5 –6 Weak – does not meet the requirements Lacks depth or support attentiontodetail 0 – 4

Critical and logical assumptions are made, constraints and policy modifications are clearly stated: Excellent meets all the requirements for this section Insightful, well-illustratedand supported 9–10 Very Good work – meets most requirements Only minor issues orlapses 7–8 Adequate work – covers the ground Not much depth, illustration orsupportoffered 5 –6 Weak – does not meet the requirements Lacks depth or support attentiontodetail 0 – 4

The cloud solution, model and provider selections process and justification demonstrate insight into: • The unique benefits andstrengths • Overview of theprovider • Clear selectionprocedure Selection procedure should fit the target IT and regulatory landscape and ensure optimal value creation. Excellent meets all the requirements for this section Insightful, well-illustratedand supported 9–10 Very Good work – meets most requirements Only minor issues orlapses 7–8 Adequate work – covers the ground Not much depth, illustration orsupportoffered 5 –6 Weak – does not meet the requirements Lacks depth or support attentiontodetail 0 – 4

The analysis provides an insight and a good understanding of the organisation existing IT landscape and captures: • UnderlyingTechnology • TCO • Risk management orGovernance Excellent meets all the requirements for this section Insightful, well-illustratedand supported 13 –15 Very Good work – meets most requirements Only minor issues or lapses 10–12 Adequate work – covers the ground Not much depth, illustration orsupportoffered 8 –9 Weak – does not meet the requirements Lacks depth or support attentiontodetail 5 – 7 Poor 0-4 Marker’s comment:

4. You need to submit the following on or before 11pm on the due date(07/09/2019) a) Completed assignment in MS Word &PowerPoint as per instructions of your course leader 5. Please retain all soft copies of your assignment for future reference; 6. Late assignments will carry a penalty (refer to assessment policy);and 7. Any student caught cheating (plagiarism) will receive zero marks. If copying is identified, all parties will receive zeromarks.

You are expected to submit professionally presented word-processed assessment documents. 1. This is an individualassignment; 2. If you have any questions or, do not understand the requirements of the assignment, please see your lecturer; 3. You are expected to submit professionally presented word-processed assessment documents. Thisincludes: • A title page showing: ID number/s, name/s, lecturers’ name/s, and assessmenttitle • Correct spelling and appropriate use ofgrammar • Pages numbered including a contentspage • Questions correctly labelled and numbered with clear and consistentheadings • For main text use Time New Roman / Arial / Calibri font type and 12pt fontsize • Line spacing no less than 1.5 and no greater thandouble. • A complete reference list should be included at the back of the assessment using Harvard AGPS style of referencing with in-textcitation;