Reference no: EM132981991
Do the Arbitrator or the Courts determine the merits of a grievance?
Do the Arbitrator or the Courts have more experience at interpreting the contract language in the CBA, and the common law of the shop?
Do the Arbitrators have great latitude in making a decision and a remedy, or are they narrowly restricted by law?
Group of answer choices
1. Arbitrators determine the merits of a grievance.
Arbitrators have more experience at interpreting the contract language in the CBA, and the common law of the shop.
Arbitrators are narrowly restricted by law regarding the basis of their decisions, and what remedies can be applied.
2. Courts determine the merits of a grievance.
Arbitrators have more experience at interpreting the contract language in the CBA, and the common law of the shop.
Arbitrators are narrowly restricted by law regarding the basis of their decisions, and what remedies can be applied.
3.Courts determine the merits of a grievance.
Arbitrators have more experience at interpreting the contract language in the CBA, and the common law of the shop.
Arbitrators have great latitude in making a decision and a remedy regarding the basis of their decisions.
4. Arbitrators determine the merits of a grievance.
Arbitrators have more experience at interpreting the contract language in the CBA, and the common law of the shop.
Arbitrators have great latitude in making a decision and a remedy regarding the basis of their decisions.