I have received the assessment even before the given deadline. I hope that the solution is perfect as it seems after first look. I must say that there is no issues of price when you ask expertsmind. Just submit your task with all the relevant informations and forget about the quality what else a student require more. Service is always great as usual. thanks

• The case was published in 2012 and you should answer the questions in terms of the information presented in the case up to this time. You are not required to go beyond the case end date since your analysis and judgement are being assessed at this point, not in the light of subsequent events. As a result, you should not include references on Domino’s Pizza from sources other than those contained in the case. Word Limit: Word Length: no longer than 4000 words The word limit excludes appendices and bibliography. Where a submission exceeds the stated word limit the maximum mark awarded will be 40%. Late submission will normally be capped at 40%. Appendices can be a useful to provide additional information from your analysis provided that the key points are incorporated into the main body of the answer text. Submission deadline: Friday 8th, 11:59pm (UK time)

Assessment presentation information As you prepare your case analysis there are a few other points you must take into account. • A case analysis is not a conceptual explanation or discussion so do not spend too much time on conceptual explanation, instead your focus should be on how the concepts are used to analyse the case events and reach evaluative judgments. • Always draw on evidence from the case to support your analysis and conclusions. Using evidence without analysis will amount to describing what has happened in the case and will not gain many marks. • It is critically important that if you use quotes from the case or academic texts, you do so selectively and they must be placed in quotation marks and referenced appropriately.

Assessment Category PESTEL analysis of Domino’s Pizza external environment (15%) Five forces analysis of the Pizza industry (25%) Value chain analysis of Domino’s value chain capabilities and core competencies (30%) Discussion Domino’s direction of growth: Ansoff’s Matrix and recommendations (20%) Presentation of analysis, use of case evidence and conclusion. (10%)

If material is simply reproduced from the case study, using the same words, this will be treated as plagiarism and a fail mark will be given. Material copied from websites or other sources that provide ready made solutions to coursework will be deemed an academic offence and subject to disciplinary action. Grades will be awarded according to the following weightings and criteria and your assessment will be marked using the feedback sheet over page.

FAIL • 35-40% - An answer that has some limited relevance to the question set, but showing little grasp of the issues raised. The content is descriptive and based on common sense rather than the application of analytical models • 30-34% - Demonstrates an extremely weak knowledge of the question with no grasp of the issues raised by it. Poorly constructed and poorly directed. • 0-29% - A poorly directed answer containing a few minor relevant points, and only a rudimentary attempt at discussion. Lower marks will be awarded to answers falling short even of this description, down to 0 for no answer. Note, that in ALL categories above it is expected that you will provide a bibliography (where applicable) of the material used in preparation of your assignment.

CLASS 2:1 • 65-69% - An answer demonstrating very good understanding of the issues with a well organised argument accurately demonstrating the ability to integrate material from various parts of the module • 60-64% - As above, although there may be some shortcomings, but no fundamental omissions or errors. CLASS 2:2 • 55-59% - An answer which shows a satisfactory grasp of the main issues, familiarity with the basic reading, some minor errors and omissions of essential material. • 50-54% - As above, but with a larger number of errors, omissions, and/or the inclusion of some irrelevant material. CLASS 3 • 45-49% - An answer containing some use of relevant material and the basic application of analytical techniques which shows some understanding of some of the issues raised by the question but only a minimal or no understanding of others. • 40-45% - As above with even less relevant material and not as well directed to the question. The answer can be considered a bare pass.

Below we give you a schedule which is used as the basis for marking your assignment in Strategic Management. This will help you to judge what you need to do to achieve any given mark range. CLASS 1 • 90-100% - An outstanding answer showing an excellent understanding of the issues and methodologies; original, independent thinking informs an answer based upon rigorous clearly directed argument accurately supported by evidence; close to perfection and could not be bettered at undergraduate level in the time available. • 80-89% - An answer demonstrating an excellent level of understanding of the issues and methodologies. The answer displays independent thought, and strong and very well organised argument, demonstrating the ability to integrate a wide range of techniques. • 70-79% - An answer showing most (although not necessarily all) of the above criteria