A few grammar mistakes but overall awesome. thank you for your services, i was really hesitant and scared about doing this but really was a breeze appreciate the help!

The assignment must have pictures explaining the methods of how Mpls work can it be included?

References 10% No references found or a general reference like www.google.co m References provided are not appropriate. Mostly inappropriate references provided. Just a list of sources found which are not academically acceptable (ex. Wikipedia etc.) No in-text citations found. Reference list is provided and the sources are somehow relevant. No in-text citations found. Reference list is provided and the sources are relevant. In-text citations are found and academically accepted reference list is provided. A proper Harvard referencing style is followed and all the sources are academically accepted.

Conclusion 10% No conclusion found Conclusion provided is not relevant to the topic General or mostly irrelevant conclusion provided Few relevant points are given that somehow reflected the outcome of the study. Some relevant points are given that partially reflected the outcomes of the study. Relevant conclusion that reflected the outcomes of the study are given. Some points were drawn from the actual work done. The conclusion adequately reflected the outcomes of the study and is relevant to the actual work done. Recommendation 10% No recommendatio n found Recommendatio ns provided are not relevant to the topic General or mostly irrelevant recommendation provided Some relevant recommendations are given. No suggestions for further studies given. Some relevant recommendations are given. Suggestions for further studies given but are not feasible for implementation. Relevant recommendations are given. It includes suggestions for further studies that are somehow feasible. Relevant recommendations. It includes suggestions for further studies that are feasible.

Analysis 15% No analysis is found Provided points are not relevant. Lacks analysis Provided points are mostly irrelevant. Lacks analysis Analysis is done and few points/key issues are identified Analysis is done. Explanation is missing. Analysis and explanation found is mostly relevant A critical analysis is found with detailed, relevant explanation Discussion 25% No discussion found Discussion provided is not relevant to the topic. General discussion was provided. No evidence of own ideas given. Few evidence found illustrating that the student tried to provide some relevant discussions of own ideas proposed. Student tried to discuss on the points/issues identified in the analysis section and some relevant discussions of own ideas are proposed Ideas proposed by the student are mostly correct and adequately documented. Adds some value to the body of knowledge Ideas proposed are completely relevant and practical. Adds consistent amount of value to the body of knowledge.

Operation 20% Nothing is written in this heading Limited material provided. Flow of discussion is not logically organized. Limited material provided. Flow of discussion is mostly not logically organized. Many transitions are unclear or non-existent. Some material relevant to subtopics and main topic. Arguments lack logical flow. Attempted to provide variety of transitions Material provided are mostly relevant to subtopics and main topic and covers essential points. Arguments are somehow logically organized and contains variety of transitions All material are relevant to subtopic and main topic and covers all essential points. Arguments are logically organized within subtopics. Clear, varied transitions linking subtopics, and main topic. All material are relevant to subtopic and main topic and covers all essential points. Strong organization and integration of material within subtopics. Strong transitions linking subtopics, and main topic.

Marking Scheme Criteria Substandard 0 Poor 20 Satisfactory 40 Good 50 Very Good 60 Excellent 70 Outstanding 100 Introduction 10 % No introduction found Introduction provided is not relevant to the topic Introduction is too concise, not clear and mostly irrelevant to the selected topic Conveys main topic adequately. Does not describe subtopics Lacks adequate research statement. Conveys topic, but not key question(s). General theses statement. Conveys topic and key areas. Clearly defines the subtopics. General thesis statement. Strong introduction of topic’s key areas. Clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed. Specific thesis statement.

New Grading System (Starting Feb. 2015) Grade Letter Mark Band % Grade Descriptor A+ 80-100 Outstanding P A S S A 75-79 Excellent A- 70-74 B+ 67-69 Commendable B 64-66 B- 60-63 C+ 57-59 Good C 54-56 C- 50-53 D+ 47-49 Satisfactory D 44-46 D- 40-43 E 35-39 Marginal Fail F A I L F 25-34 Fail F- 01-24 Fail G 0 Non-Submission

B+ 13 Very Good • Very good work. • All main points will have been covered, though minor issues may have been omitted. • The work will be analytical, balanced and soundly based. • Examples and supporting evidence should have been included. • The writing should be essentially correct, without major grammatical or other errors. • Generally referenced correctly. C+ 10 Good • Generally good work. • Most points will have been covered, but many finer points will generally have been missed. • Shows limited reading. • Arguments/analysis should be basically well structured and balanced with relevant examples, but with errors and gaps. • The writing is clear, but has errors that nevertheless do not obscure the meaning. • Referencing will be present but may at times be inaccurate or insufficient. C 9 C- 8 D+ 7 Pass • Satisfactory. • Shows sufficient grasp of the subject to be acceptable. • Tends to be descriptive. • Examples and evidence is likely to be weak and limited. • Shows limited reading. • Referencing is likely to be absent or very poorly carried out.

GRADING SYSTEM Although grades may be awarded on the basis of marks in some assessments, students should note that both marks and grades will be awarded on the basis of the assessment criteria for each grade. Old grading System (Before Feb 2015) GRADE GRADE POINT DESCRIPTI ON GENERAL ASSESSMENT CRITERIA A+ 16 Excellent • An outstanding piece of work. • Shows evidence of wider reading and originality • Strongly analytical. All important points are covered. • Arguments should be supported by examples and evidence, objectively presented and evaluated, • Well-structured and well written, without noticeable grammatical or other errors. • Correctly referenced

10. All assignments must be adhered strictly to the deadlines specified by Majan College. Failure to hand in the assignment for any reason and without prior approval and a valid written extension from the module tutor will not be marked and will be awarded a grade G (0) irrespective of the quality of the work. See Student Handbook section 4.4. 11. Unacknowledged use of work of others (plagiarism) is regarded as a dishonest practice and will be will be penalized. See the penalties in the student’s handbook section 5.8.

6. This is an individual assignment and carries a 50% weighting of the module grade. 7. This assignment follows a case study format and must be original and creative. An analytical piece of work is required. The use of ‘cut and paste’ approach will be penalized. It must be presented in a structured manner, with appropriate cover page, content page, introduction, body (with appropriate heading / sub-headings), conclusion, references, page numbered and any required appendices. 8. Your report should be word processed and professionally presented. The length of your report should be at least 2500 words, presented in text of font size 12 with 1.5 line spacing. Please state the exact word count at the end of the assignment. 9. The cover page should be attached with the assignment and uploaded through MOVE (on-line). Name of the student, The Programme, Module Title, Assignment Title and number of words must be reflected on the cover sheet.

Your work will be graded on the following aspects: 1. This is an individual Assignment. 2. The assignment MUST be submitted online (through MOVE) on or before the due date mentioned in page 3. 3. Your assignment shall reflect the depth and breadth of your original analyses in a clear and coherent manner. 4. Use of the relevant academic literature to support ideas and issues discussed. The range of academic sources such as texts and journals to support your arguments and comments. 5. Any reference to authors and other writers shall be quoted with due acknowledgement in your assignment report using the Harvard Referencing System. For details of Harvard referencing style refer to the student hand book section 7.2.

can you do an assignment on comparative study between mpls and public internet ? Marking Scheme and grading policy: Your report will be graded according to: • Content completeness, accuracy, correlation and relation of the work done to the topic selected • Report structure (proper formatting of texts, tables and diagrams, correct and proper English) • Relevant and appropriate references • Good evidence of reading and research