Structure 15% The ideas are arranged in an extremely logical, structured and coherent manner. The ideas are arranged in a fairly logical, structured and coherent manner. The ideas are arranged in a logical, some-what structured and coherent manner. The ideas appear less logical, structured and presents in fairly incoherent manner. There is little, if any, coherent structure to the document. Presentation and quality of writing 15% Quality of writing at a very high standard. Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. Quality of writing is of a high standard. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. Quality of writing is of a good standard. Few grammar, spelling and punctuation mistakes. Some problems with sentence structure and presentation Frequent grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes. Use of inappropriate language. Quality of writing is at a very poor standard so barely understandable. Many spelling mistakes. Little or no evidence of proof reading.

Argument 30% Excellent and logical argument about the value of each article to the contemporary HRM issues in Assessment 3 topic, and excellent identification of the issues for your selected sector (para 2) Strong argument about the value of each article to the contemporary HRM issues in Assessment 3 topic and very good identification of the issues for your selected sector (para 2) Some argument about the value of each article to the contemporary HRM issues Assessment 3 topic andvgood identification of the issues for your selected sector (para 2) Weak argument and no discussion of the contemporary HRM issues in Assessment 3, and/or limited identification of the issues for your selected sector (para 2) Little or no argument (para 2) or little relevance to the HRM issues in Assessment 3, and little or no identification of the issues for your selected sector.

The assessment presents a detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented (para 1), demonstrating a high level ability to identify HRM strategies and practices The assessment presents a fairly detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented (para 1) The assessment presents a somewhat detailed and focused summary of the ideas presented (para 1) The assessment provides limited detail with no clear summary of the ideas presented (para 1) The assessment fails to provide any clear evidence of the ideas presented (para 1)

Key Criteria Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 85-100% Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 75 - 84% Meets Expectations (Credit) 65 – 74% Meets Expectations (Pass) 50 – 64% Below Expectations (Fail) below 50% Research 40% Utilises 5 excellent sources that are current, from credible sources and highly relevant to Assessment 3. Utilises 5 very good sources that are current, credible, and relevant to Assessment 3. Utilises 5 sources that are current and appropriate for use in Assessment 3. Utilises 5 sources that are somewhat relevant for Assessment 3. Utilises sources that are not sufficient in quantity, quality or relevance to Assessment 3

Introduction (100 words) Identify which sector you have chosen, and briefly outline the topics you have selected for this annotated bibliography Article 1 (400 words) Reference. [Insert the full reference here, in APA style] Key words: [insert the key words from the article] Para 1. Summarise the main ideas of the article, identifying the hypothesis, purpose, research methodology and conclusions. This article examines [explain …]. The purpose/research question of the article is [explain…]. The research methodology is [explain …] The article finds/concludes [summarise]

Any requests for extension must be submitted through the CQU system at least 48 hours prior to the due date, with relevant supporting documents. Late submissions without approval will result in a penalty of 5% (1.5 marks) per day.