Design a quality management plan Weighting 30% Well-articulated quality management plan designed and well- aligned to examples covered in the literature. Conclusion: Present an overview of assignment findings and lessons learned Weighting 10% Exceptionally well- presented and argued; Learnings are comprehensive, well- developed, discussion is clear and there is evidence, facts and relevant examples are presented.

Evaluation of plans: Evaluate quality management plans and discuss potential application of their principles to project management No discussion about potential application of quality management principles related to project management. Minimal discussion about potential application of quality management principles related to project management. Basic discussion about potential application of quality management principles related to project management. Useful discussion about potential application of quality management principles related to project management. Well-articulated discussion about potential application of quality management principles related to project management. Weighting 10% Proposed enhancements: Evaluate quality management plans and undertake and rationalise corrective actions to address quality management issues identified in the literature review No discussion covering analysis and approach to be followed to address quality management issues identified in literature review.

Literature review of project quality Weighting 10% Excellent well- presented and argued; ideas are comprehensive, well- developed, discussion supported by appropriate external referencing, specific evidence and facts, relevant examples suggested. Well- articulated overview covering. Quality analysis: Evaluate quality management plans and discuss adherence to major quality management principles Weighting 10% Well-articulated evaluation around quality management plans and adherence to major quality management principles.

Make sure you read the Marking Schedule below carefully before embarking on the assignment. It will give you clear idea of what we are looking for in the submission. Criteria Introduction: Introduce case study and provide context around the case Weighting 10% A (80-100) Exceptionally well- presented introduction. High level of detail presented about case study, very well- structured, presented with specific evidence and facts about the case study.

Assessed Analyse the principles of quality control in projects. Learning Outcomes: Examine the common methods of evaluating quality in projects. 4, 5, 6, 7 Develop a quality management plan. Undertake, with rationale, corrective action to address a quality management issue in a specific example. Conditions: This is a compulsory assignment. It must be submitted and makes up 40% or your final result for this paper. The completed assignment is to be submitted to your facilitator via Blackboard by the due date.