urv2091158
12/13/2018 12:57:15 AM
I just checked my grade card and I am pleased to inform you that I received 100% marks with the assignment that you provided me. Expertsmind has always provided satisfactory answers for all the queries and I hope that we will see the best in future also with your team.
|
len2091158
8/21/2018 12:55:24 AM
Written Communication: Source Requirement
Total: 0.50
Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient - Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations - Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
|
len2091158
8/21/2018 12:55:19 AM
Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 0.60
Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
|
len2091158
8/21/2018 12:55:14 AM
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 0.60
Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic - Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
|
len2091158
8/21/2018 12:55:02 AM
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.60
Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.
Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
|
len2091158
8/21/2018 12:54:54 AM
Analyzes What Side of the Bargaining Table You Agree With, Players or Owners
Total: 0.90
Distinguished - The analysis of what side of the bargaining table you agree with, players or owners, is thorough, and includes specific details on the lockout. The response is appropriately supported by scholarly sources.
Proficient - The analysis of what side of the bargaining table you agree with, players or owners, is informative, but is lacking detailed elements of the issues in the lockout. The response is partially supported by scholarly sources.
Basic - The analysis of what side of the bargaining table you agree with, players or owners, is limited in detail and substance. The response is minimally supported by scholarly sources.
Below Expectations - The analysis of what side of the bargaining table you agree with, players or owners, is incomplete. The response is lacking support from scholarly sources.
Non-Performance - The analysis of what side of the bargaining table you agree with, players or owners, is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
|
len2091158
8/21/2018 12:54:49 AM
Describes the Major Issues Involved in the 2004-2005 NHL Lockout
Total: 0.90
Distinguished - The description of the major issues involved in the 2004-2005 NHL lockout is thorough and includes specific details on the lockout. The description is appropriately supported by scholarly sources.
Proficient - The description of the major issues involved in the 2004-2005 NHL lockout is informative, but is lacking detailed elements of the lockout. The description is partially supported by scholarly sources.
Basic - The description of the major issues involved in the 2004-2005 NHL lockout is limited in detail and substance. The description is minimally supported by scholarly sources.
Below Expectations - The description of the major issues involved in the 2004-2005 NHL lockout is incomplete. The description is lacking support from scholarly sources.
Non-Performance - The description of the major issues involved in the 2004-2005 NHL lockout is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
|
len2091158
8/21/2018 12:54:44 AM
Total Possible Score: 5.00
Examines the Background of the 2004-2005 NHL Lockout
Total: 0.90
Distinguished - The examination of the background of the 2004-2005 NHL lockout is thorough and includes specific details on the lockout. The response is appropriately supported by scholarly sources.
Proficient - The examination of the background of the 2004-2005 NHL lockout is informative, but is lacking detailed elements of the lockout. The response is partially supported by scholarly sources.
Basic - The examination of the background of the 2004-2005 NHL lockout is limited in detail and substance. The response is partially supported by scholarly sources.
Below Expectations - The examination of the background of the 2004-2005 NHL lockout is incomplete. The response is lacking support from scholarly sources.
Non-Performance - The examination of the background of the 2004-2005 NHL lockout is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
|