Reference no: EM131333794
Discussion - Probability and Non-probability Sampling
A sample is a finite part of a population whose properties are studied to gain information about the whole. When dealing with people, researchers define a sample as a set of respondents (people) selected from a larger population for the purpose of a survey. The difficulty in using sampling lies in planning: a sample's generalizability must be evaluated and a sampling method must be chosen that will best suit the research needs in question.
Sampling methods are divided into two broad categories: probability and non-probability. The difference between probability and non-probability sampling is the selection technique employed. Probability sampling includes any method of sampling that utilizes some form of random selection. In order to have a random selection method within probability sampling, you must set up some process or procedure that assures that the different units in your population have equal probabilities of being chosen. Non-probability sampling, then, does not involve random selection, so researchers cannot know ahead of time the probability of an element being chosen. Though you might be tempted to conclude that non-probability samples cannot be representative of a population, this is not necessarily the case. When designing a sample or evaluating research that has used sampling, it is important to know the strengths and weaknesses of different types of sampling methods. The more a researcher or consumer of research knows about sampling methods, the better chance he or she has of making smart research decisions.
For this Discussion, select one type of probability sampling and one type of non-probability sampling and think of potential strengths and weaknesses of each. Then consider ethical considerations that might arise when selecting a sampling method and how you might address them.
With these thoughts in mind:
Post a description of the types of probability and non-probability sampling you selected. Then describe two strengths and two weaknesses of each type of sampling. Finally, identify two ethical considerations that may factor into selecting a sampling method and explain how you might address these considerations.
|
Discuss about the evaluation of the program
: Though each grant proposal differs based on the specific technology, program, or construction that is being requested, there are a number of common building blocks in each proposal. Describe at least 4 of the different elements below that are comm..
|
|
Proximate and ultimate causes of the behavior
: We all see animals in our day to day lives. Choose a behavior you saw exhibited by an animal. Explain your thoughts on the potential proximate and ultimate causes of the behavior.
|
|
Implement the first text-formatting design proposed
: Implement the first text-formatting design proposed. Try to avoid the need for shifting word fragments after the current line is printed.
|
|
Prove the given condition
: Prove that if the result of the men's courtship algorithm yields the same result as the women's courtship algorithm, then this resulting matching is the unique stable matching.
|
|
Description of probability and nonprobability sampling
: Post a description of the types of probability and non-probability sampling you selected. Then describe two strengths and two weaknesses of each type of sampling. Finally, identify two ethical considerations that may factor into selecting a sampli..
|
|
Generalize the conclusion to a subset of k pairs
: Is it possible to find three pairs such that if the matching among them is changed, each man will be matched to a woman whom he prefers, and each woman will be matched to a man whom she prefers?
|
|
Implement this hash search method
: If items are retrieved from a hash table with unequal frequencies a gradual speed-up in retrieval can be obtained by shifting each item as it is retrieved one position closer to its original hash position by performing an exchange. Implement this ..
|
|
Is there necessarily a stable matching
: Is there necessarily a stable matching under which Julius is matched to Messalina? Either prove this statement or provide a counter example.
|
|
Explored importance of conceptualizing and defining variable
: In previous weeks of the course, you explored the importance of conceptualizing and defining variables. Those tasks set the guidelines for research and have many important consequences for the results
|