Reference no: EM133427017
Assignment:
Part I. (add in text citation)
- Share TWO evidence-based approaches you would use as a school social worker with students. Make sure to discuss each approach in detail and provide a description of the intervention. Discuss for each what level of prevention the approach addresses (Tier 1, 2, or 3), for what behavior or academic purpose the approach serves.
- Why did you choose the two evidence-based approaches over other evidence-based modalities?
- What your goal would be by using this approach, and what age group you are using this approach with.
- Discuss if your level of prevention is trauma-informed, and if so, how? Make sure to discuss your approach in detail.
Reference:
Powers, J. (2010). Ecological Risk and Resilience Perspective: A Theoretical Framework Supporting Evidence-based Practice in Schools. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 7(5), 443-451.
Joseph, A. A., Wilcox, S. M., Hnilica, R. J., & Hansen, M. C. (2020). Keeping Race at the Center of School Discipline Practices and Trauma-Informed Care: An Interprofessional Framework. Children & Schools, 42(3), 161-170.
Avant, D. W., & Lindsey, B. C. (2015) School social workers as response to intervention change champions. Advances in Social Work, 16(2), 276-291.
Part II. (Add in text citation for every question)
- Share your comfort level performing a risk and/or threat assessment
- Discuss steps you would take to gain confidence
- Discuss barriers to performing a risk/threat assessment.
- Any triggers you might encounter? Have you thought about this? How might you address these? Make sure to be thorough in the response.
- How you might support fellow colleagues and/or educate others in the field on the steps to completing an assessment.
- How might you describe the steps to a colleague or to a parent? Provide examples.
Reference:
Burnette, A. G., Huang, F., Maeng, J. L., & Cornell, D. (2019). School threat assessment versus suicide assessment: Statewide prevalence and case characteristics. Psychology in the Schools, 56(3), 378-392.