PLEASE SEE ATTACHED AND DO ACCORDINGLY ACCORDING TO INSTRUCTIONS. THANK YOU. NO CONTENTS PAGE DO IN ESSAY FORMAT Write a 1,000–1,250-word paper that discusses the process involved in agency-based consultation New Assignment

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Analysis of the relationship, practices, and instruments that are common in the behavioral health setting is presented but incomplete. Analysis of the relationship, practices, and instruments that are common in the behavioral health setting is presented but done at a perfunctory level. Analysis of the relationship, practices, and instruments that are common in the behavioral health setting is clearly present. Discussion is thoughtful. Research is from scholarly but some outdated sources. Analysis of the relationship, practices, and instruments that are common in the behavioral health setting is clearly present. Discussion is insightful. Research is from scholarly, current sources.

Discussion of what the research says regarding the ways in which culturally competent consulting can be provided to organizations is presented but incomplete. Discussion of what the research says regarding the ways in which culturally competent consulting can be provided to organizations is presented but done at a perfunctory level. Discussion of what the research says regarding the ways in which culturally competent consulting can be provided to organizations is clearly presented and thoughtful. Research is from scholarly but some outdated sources. Discussion of what the research says regarding the ways in which culturally competent consulting can be provided to organizations is clearly presented and insightful. Research is from scholarly and current sources.

What are the Different Ways in Which Consultants Work with Leaders, Teams, and Individuals in Organizations for Which They are Consulting. 20.0% Discussion of the different ways in which consultants work with leaders, teams, and individuals in the organization for which they are consulting is not presented. Discussion of the different ways in which consultants work with leaders, teams, and individuals in the organization for which they are consulting is presented but incomplete. Discussion of the different ways in which consultants work with leaders, teams, and individuals in the organization for which they are consulting is presented but done at a perfunctory level. Discussion of the different ways in which consultants work with leaders, teams, and individuals in the organization for which they are consulting is clearly presented and thoughtful. Research is from scholarly but some outdated sources. Discussion of the different ways in which consultants work with leaders, teams, and individuals in the organization for which they are consulting is clearly presented and insightful. Research is from scholarly and current sources.

Double Spaced, Roman x12; Empirical Literature only 3 years old. 1000 words only, Please look at Rubic to write accordingly. Thank you. Review the Processes Involved in Agency-Based Consultation. 10.0% Discussion of the processes involved in agency-based consultation is not presented. Discussion of the processes involved in agency-based consultation is presented but incomplete. Discussion of the processes involved in agency-based consultation is but in a perfunctory manner. Discussion of the processes involved in agency-based consultation is clearly presented and thoughtful. Discussion of the processes involved in agency-based consultation is clearly presented and insightful.