Reference no: EM133603490
Post an analysis of one organizational theory (systems theories_. In your analysis, describe the main idea of the theory and its strengths and limitations as applied to social work organizations. Explain why you are most drawn to this particular theory.
From readings down below ( this is not part of the question or the answers as it is a direct quote from readings)
"Systems theories:
- Several other organizational theories arose in the later twentieth century to build on the classical and neoclassical foundations. These theories include systems theories (including general systems theory and modern system theory), contingency theory (also called decision theory), and chaos theory. All take different stances on important organizational principles but have in common an emphasis on the organization's role in the ever-changing conditions that exist both inside and outside the organization.
Systems theories hold that organizations are dynamic, almost living systems that must change constantly to adapt to internal and external developments. Organizations are profoundly impacted by their environments, including cultural norms, social changes, technological advancements, and government actions and policies. Far from being a detriment, this dynamic is seen by modern systems theorists as a positive interplay that can be used to increase productivity.
- Introduction
Systems theories provide a general framework for the integration of different fields in science. They are, in essence, theories of organization. Until the beginning of the twentieth century, science was dominated by a reductionist viewpoint. Scientists believed that the way to understand something was to take it apart and see what it was made of. After a while, however, all they were left with were molecules. Systems thinking provided another way of looking at the world that better accounted for its complexity. Instead of trying to understand something by studying it in isolation, scientists looked at what types of patterns emerged when elements interacted. Thinking in terms of systems greatly increased after World War II and occurred independently in different parts of the world, thus creating systems science. Influential figures in the development of modern systems thinking include the English psychiatrist William Ross Ashby (1903-1972), English anthropologist Gregory Bateson (1904-1980), and English economist Kenneth Boulding (1910-1993). 1945 Austrian biologist Ludwig von Bertalanffy (1901-1972) formalized general systems theory.
According to systems theorists, reality is a hierarchy of interconnected systems of higher and lower orders. For example, the cell, which is a system on its own, is part of the human body system, which is part of a social system, which is a part of the planetary system, which is a part of the solar system. What all these systems have in common is the way they are organized. They possess general system characteristics, regardless of whether the system is physical, biological, psychological, or social. They may look different, but they all obey the same rules. They all share similar structures and functions.
The structure of a system refers to the way its elements are interrelated. It can be seen as the "program" determining how elements interact or its design. The function of a system refers to what the system is "designed" to do. Some systems are characterized by their tendency to maintain steady states or equilibrium. In this sense, systems appear to be goal-oriented. Systems that achieve a certain balance are said to be self-stabilizing or self-regulating. One way systems can achieve this stability is via the structure of feedback loops, where information from one part of the system is fed to other parts and back again, creating a continuous flow of communication. This allows the system to adjust by comparing its current state to a "desired" state. This particular type of systems theory, cybernetics, was introduced by Norbert Weiner in 1948. The thermostat is an example of this type of system.
Many different systems theories exist, with applications in physics, chemistry, biology, psychology, sociology, and other fields. Regardless of the specific field of study, scientists find that many different types of phenomena can be categorized under the same "system" umbrella. Because many systems work in essentially the same way, knowledge can be transferred from one field of study to another. In a sense, different fields of study provide different examples of the same types of systems.
Systems Theories and Psychology
Many psychological theories have been inspired by systems thinking. These include ecological systems theory, cognitive systems theory, and field theory. Fields of applied psychology, such as ergonomics, industrial and organizational psychology, and family systems theory, also adopt a systemic perspective. All these psychological theories and approaches have in common that they all take a step back and observe how dynamic interaction produces observable behavior. For example, a work environment, a family, and an individual can all be considered systems at different levels. In seeking to solve problems, systems psychologists consider the impact of each of these elements on the functioning of the entire system. They consider, as expressed in Gestalt psychology that the whole is different from the sum of its parts. Indeed, a human being cannot be adequately represented if reduced only to a body plus mental functioning.
By studying what is expected in the way elements of physical, biological, social, or other types of systems interact to create a whole, systems scientists are able to get a clearer view of the big picture. This holistic perspective allows scientists to continually uncover general patterns in nature and ultimately arrive at unifying principles of science.