Describe some problems in arguing about human nature

Assignment Help Humanities

Reference no: EM133357936

Assignment:

On pp. 56-58, G describes what she sees as 'Some Problems in Arguing About Human Nature'. The first part of this section is 'exposition'; it gives us the observations and information we need to follow her argument. In the last part, G spells out what she means by 'problems'. Can you describe what this problem?

Reference no: EM133357936

Questions Cloud

Discuss corporate environmental responsibility : Corporate Environmental Responsibility Joe DesJardins argues that there are two things an adequate account of corporate environmental responsibility should do.

Elements of stakeholder theory : Briefly outline the main elements of stakeholder theory. Do you think stakeholder theory can successfully support corporate responsibilities toward animals?

How people can make mistakes about your social identity : Does reflecting on this experience help you to understand how other people can make mistakes about your social identity?

Explain the nature of holiness : If it is the second, then the gods are unnecessary to explain holiness-and you yourself have again failed to explain, the nature of holiness.

Describe some problems in arguing about human nature : Describes what she sees as 'Some Problems in Arguing About Human Nature'. The first part of this section is 'exposition'; it gives us the observations.

What does the notion of human nature is a normative one : What does G mean when she says (top p. 56) that the notion of 'human nature' is a 'normative one'.

Explain what cultural relativism is according to rachels : Explain what cultural relativism is according to Rachels. Explain what is wrong with cultural relativism according to Rachels.

Definition of epistemology and metaphysics : Provide a clear definition of Epistemology and Metaphysics. Provide a clear definition of Axiology and Logic.

Why is the rational faculty so important in epictetus view : Why is the rational faculty (i.e., capacity) so important, in Epictetus's view? Would Plato agree with him? Why or why not?

User Account

All Pages