Criteria HD 100% - 85% DI 84% - 75% CR 74% - 65% PS 64% - 50% FL 49% - 0 300-500 word Report on investigation and validation methods Standard practice for potential fraud case(s) investigation and data validation methods excellent explanation, justification with MS Word and Excel hashes snapshots provided, explained and references are provided. Standard practice for potential fraud case(s) investigation and data validation methods reasonable explanation, justification with MS Word and Excel hashes snapshots provided, explained and references are provided. Standard practice for potential fraud case(s) investigation and data validation methods some minor errors in explanation, justification with MS Word and Excel hashes snapshots provided, explained and references are provided. Standard practice for potential fraud case(s) investigation and data validation methods provided but it lacks reasoning for the with MS Word and Excel hashes snapshots provided, explained and references are provided. Little or no evidence of research conducted.

Criteria HD 100% - 85% DI 84% - 75% CR 74% - 65% PS 64% - 50% FL 49% - 0 Hands-On Project 4.3 (5 marks) Project is completed, evidence of all steps is provided, paper provides excellent explanation of the importance of files examined and how might they affect the case. Project is completed, evidence of most steps is provided, paper provides very good explanation of the importance of files examined and how might they affect the case. Project is mostly completed, evidence of most steps is provided, paper provides reasonable explanation of the importance of files examined and how might they affect the case. Project is mostly completed but with errors and lack of evidence, some steps are missing, explanation of the importance of files examined is missing some details. Evidence of some steps in the project is provided, report is missing most details.

i want report and reference with apa style - Criteria HD 100% - 85% DI 84% - 75% CR 74% - 65% PS 64% - 50% FL 49% - 0 Reflection on Hands-On Projects (5 marks) An outstanding reflection statement which includes strong analysis and documents fully the experience gained by completing each of the five projects and clearly states five things learned or discovered supported by evidence e.g., images, screenshots. An excellent reflection statement which includes analysis and documents most of the experience gained by completing each of the five projects and mentions five things learned or discovered supported by evidence e.g., images, screenshots. A very good reflection statement which includes analysis and describes experience gained by completing each of the five projects and states five things learned or discovered. Some evidence of projects completion is provided. Good reflection statement which includes analysis and describes experience gained by completing each of the five projects and states five things learned or discovered. Evidence provided is incomplete or missing. Reflection provided little or no learning experience. No evidence is provided.