Describe how the current results fit

Reference no: EM133628807

Analysis of the attributions made to luck versus skill in explaining the performance of the stimulus person showed that as predicted,performance by a male on a masculine task was same at wes setil emote eure op to contry to ple in the there were did not be i res intu eran emies,The eminiy of attributional analysis in the study of perceived sex differences was discussed.

Investigations of the evaluation of male and female performance in equivalent situations have tended to focus on the ratings made of the performance itself,frequently finding that the male tends to be rated more favorably than the female when the presented evidence is identical.Thus, presenting rather broadly and generally described evidence about the performance of a male or female author (Gold-berg, 1968),a male or female painter (Phet-erson, Kiesler,& Goldberg, 1971),and a male or female applicant for a study-abroad program (Deaux & Taynor,1973),the cited authors have found that the male's performance tends to be rated more favorably than the female's. I. Introduction A. What is the main issue or problem that is being investigated? B. How does relevant previous research and theory (reviewed in the Introduction) provide a rationale for the current study? C. What are the specific hypotheses (including expected direction of relationships between variables) that are tested in the current study? D. What independent (or predictor) and dependent (or criterion) variables are being investigated? How are the variables operationalized (defined and measured)? E. What is the design of the study? II. Method A. Participants. Provide the number, type, mean age, sex breakdown, and any specific or unusual characteristics. B. Measures/Materials/Apparatus. Provide descriptions of measurement instruments that are used to measure the main variables (e.g., any survey or questions completed by participants, any participant behavior that is observed or recorded). When describing self-report measures, include scale anchors (e.g., 1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree) and a sample item. C. Procedure. Provide an overall description of procedures followed in data collection, including random assignment of participants to groups, manipulation of independent variables, and so on. You do not have to include a description of participant recruitment, informed consent, credit for participation, etc.; however, you should describe instructions to participants that are relevant to manipulation or measurement of variables. III. Results

A. What are the main results in terms of the hypotheses (i.e., are hypotheses confirmed or not?)?

Describe results that pertain directly to hypotheses in terms of group differences or statistical relationships. Description of results should be broad; you do not have to include specific descriptive statistics or test results in your report. IV. Discussion

A. What general conclusions were drawn by the researchers?

B. Describe how the current results fit or do not fit with the findings of previous research. Do the current results add anything unique or important to understanding of the phenomena in question?

C. What are the limitations/flaws of the current study? How could the results be interpreted differently? What future research can be done based on the study results?

Reference no: EM133628807

Questions Cloud

Why risk management important in modern global supply chain : Imagine you work in Logistics department of Intel. Discuss 3 reasons why risk management is important in a modern global supply chain like Intel.

Do you believe this to be a conflict of interest : Do you believe this to be a conflict of interest? Should independent labs be utilized to ensure more emphasis on neutrality

Explain how the program works and how it helps : Find at least one public program that addresses at least one of these vulnerabilities. Please explain how the program works and how it helps to reduce

Which is most likely reason presentation was unsuccessful : The presentation itself was not particularly effective and audience members appeared distracted. Which is most likely reason the presentation was unsuccessful?

Describe how the current results fit : Describe how the current results fit or do not fit with the findings of previous research. Do the current results add anything unique or important to understand

What are some policies or practices institutionally : What are some policies or practices institutionally, within the companies that you would put in place that could have deterred the commission of those crimes

What is the overall job satisfaction of employees : What is the overall job satisfaction of employees? Are the employees getting the information they need to make empowered decisions, and are they engaged?

What are your greatest strengths and weaknesses : How would you describe yourself? What are your greatest strengths and weaknesses? Why should I hire you for this position

Explain how reinforcement history has shaped current pattern : A staff member constantly asking for feedback on performance. Explain how reinforcement history has shaped current pattern for the staff member and the trainer.

User Account

All Pages