Reference no: EM132901031
Read the case and answer the case questions below. You can answer the questions in point form.
Case-
Maud Williams has been working for the last several years in the research and development department of a semiconductor manufacturing company employing 120 staff. Because of her "good people skills", Maud has recently been asked to take on the role of Human Resources Manager. Maud knows the job will be a challenge but is very excited at this opportunity to advance her career.
The HR manager she is to replace was not well liked and recently left the company under a cloud after giving management poor advice. This manager was perceived as a task focused and one who would often challenge staff over trivial issues. Company HR policies were interpreted literally and without any flexibility. For example, if a staff member was only five minutes late in coming back from lunch, they would be reminded of the "hours of work and break times" regardless of their performance.
A number of other problems within the organization have also added to eroded trust in management. The final straw was the dismissal of a well-liked employee by the previous human resources manager. The general opinion among the other employees is that this staff member was poorly treated and should have been reinstated by senior management. Staff felt angry and frustrated when the general manager refused to meet with a union steward over the employee's dismissal. Since then, loyalties have been divided and many staff support the former employee's claim against the company for unfair dismissal.
Quite apart from this latest issue, morale has been declining for some months. Last month a major contract was lost, when the contractor complained about poor quality of service and errors in reporting. There is increasing pressure from management for productivity improvements, and this has caused fear among staff that there may be job losses in the push for improved quality and performance.
Maud raised some of her concerns about the HR manager's position with the General Manager when he first offered her the position. He said he had no choice but to support of the other HR manager's decision, and staff were not aware of the full story. He also told Maud he "wanted to look to the future" and was prepared to give her a "free reign" over a six-month trial period prior to making the appointment permanent.
The General Manager has asked Maud to focus on improving morale and achieving a "Quality" culture at the organization.
Case Questions-
1. Considering Maud as a manager, what style best describes her leadership? Give examples where she demonstrates the style you describe.
2. How would you describe the current organizational culture at Maud's organization?
3. Using the Force-Field Analysis model, describe the strategy Maud should use to move the status quo to a desired state (i.e. improved morale and increased quality)? Be specific and use correct terminology.
4. What are three types of forces resisting change that the Maud and the company will potentially experience during this change process? What are the sources of the resistance? How should Maud overcome the resistance?