Academic Integrity Policy KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy. Word Limits for Written Assessments Submissions that exceed the word count by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded. Study Assistance Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Success Centre representative or refer to the study help on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. You can find this by clicking on the top page toolbar:

Conclusion and Assignment written in a Assignment written in a Assignment written in Assignment written written cohesive manner, by cohesive manner, by a somewhat cohesive with structure but assignment addressing questions directly addressing questions manner, by somewhat reads awkwardly. and comprehensively. Sound directly. Sound and addressing the Assignment question and convincing conclusions and convincing conclusions questions. Sound answers draw a judgements drawn from the and judgements drawn conclusion drawn from conclusion but not discussion. Appropriate citation from the discussion. the discussion. necessarily drawn and references given to support Appropriate citation and Appropriate citation from the discussion. the discussion to help draw a references given to and references given Some missing sound, well argued conclusion. support the discussion to to support the references and Assignment written within the help draw a sound discussion to help citations. Assignment word limits. conclusion. Assignment draw a conclusion. written exceeding the written within the word Assignment written word limits. limits. within the word limits.

Analysis, Analysis and evaluation Analysis and evaluation Analysis and Analysis and Analysis and evaluation and supported by comprehensive supported by evaluation supported argument supported argument not judgment discussion and argument and comprehensive discussion by broad discussion in part by some apparent. Lacks leading to a supported judgment and argument and leading and argument. Much discussion and argument and which addresses the case study to a clear judgment which evidence in the work argument. Some discussion. Little or questions. Student is able to addresses the case study of critical reasoning. evidence in the work no evidence in the link analysis with the data - questions. Copious of critical reasoning work of critical making informed judgment by evidence in the work of reasoning combining data and theory in critical reasoning. coming up with their conclusions. Copious evidence in the work of critical reasoning and synthesis.

High Distinction Distinction Credit Knowledge, In addressing the economic In addressing the In responding to the comprehension issues, the assignment clearly economic issues in the economic issues in the and application identifies, defines and critically case study, the case study, the applies relevant theories and assignment 1 clearly assignment defines concepts sourced from more identifies, defines and and applies relevant than 3 quality sources. Correct applies relevant theories theories and concepts graphs and charts are applied and concepts sourced from sourced from at least 3 and correct analysis is more than 3 quality sources. undertaken with reference to sources. Correct graphs the graphs/charts. and charts are used, but minimal explanations are given with reference to the charts