(20%) Identification of critical issues relating to processes and practices concerning organisational structure and design. (15%) No identification of critical issue relating to organisational structure and design. Adequate but superficial identification of critical issue relating to organisational structure and design. Some insightful identification of critical issue relating to organisational structure and design. Excellent and insightful identification of critical issue relating to organisational structure and design. Impressive, insightful and original identification of critical issue relating to organisational structure and design.

Utilisation of at least three references sourced from appropriate readings for weeks 1-5. (20%) Utilisation of at least three appropriate references sourced independently from scholarly journals in the Library Website Resources. No, or little utilisation of appropriate references demonstrated. No, or little utilisation of independently sourced references. References not appropriate. Adequate but superficial utilisation of appropriate references demonstrated. Adequate but superficial utilisation of independently sourced references. References tangentially appropriate. Some thoughtful utilisation of appropriate references demonstrated. Some thoughtful utilisation of independently sourced references. References appropriate. Excellent and insightful utilisation of appropriate references demonstrated. Excellent and insightful utilisation of independently sourced references. References important. Impressive, insightful and original utilisation of appropriate references demonstrated. Impressive, insightful and original utilisation of independently sourced references. References highly significant.

PASSMinimal evidence of identifying an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structures / structure and design. Minimal evidence of explaining an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structure and design. Moderate evidence of identifying an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structure and design. Moderate evidence of explaining an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structure and design. DISTINCTION Comprehensive evidence of identifying an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structure and design. Comprehensive evidence of explaining an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structures / structure and design. HIGH DISTINCTIONRich and convincing evidence of identifying an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structure and design. Rich and convincing evidence of explaining an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structure and design.

200825 Understanding Contemporary Organisations Quarter 2 2018 Marking criteria and standards CRITERIA FAIL Evidence of identifying an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structure and design. (15%) Evidence of explaining an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structure and design (15%) No, or very little, evidence of identifying an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structure and design. No, or very little, evidence of explaining an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structure and design.

Outline of No outline. Minimal outline. Adequate marketing outline. practices. (15%) Comprehensive outline. Effective and comprehensive outline. Explanation of financial practices. (15%) Poor explanation. Adequate explanation. Well-organised explanation. Attractively organised and effectively clear explanation. Excellently comprehensive and effectively clear explanation. Organisation and clarity of expression of written report. (10%) Contribution to group meetings. (10%) Preparation of quality work for submission. Unsatisfactory expression and organisation of report unclear. Satisfactory but with difficulties. Some language mistakes; basically well written. Very well written. Highly valued. Excellent writing. Crucial and highly valued. Crucially important and highly valued. (10%)

Marking criteria and standards CRITERIA FAIL PASS CREDIT DISTINCTION HIGH DISTINCTION Integration of analysis. (10%) Not demonstrated. Minimally demonstrated. Adequately demonstrated. Comprehensively Creatively and demonstrated. comprehensively demonstrated. Description of organisational structures. (15%) Explanation of people management practices. (15%) Not appropriate/ inadequate. Not demonstrated. Minimally appropriate explanation. Adequate and appropriate explanation. Comprehensive and insightful description. Superior and, at times, critically appropriate explanation. Creative, comprehensive and insightful description. Superior and, at times, critically appropriate explanation.

n The group is expected to figure out how best to work together. n It is the responsibility of group members to decide on roles, meeting schedules and all activities necessary to developing the report. n Each student's contribution to this assessment task will be peer moderated (see marking criteria and standards rubric). The peer moderation will be conducted in Session 10. The system for peer moderation will be explained in the preceding weeks. n Assessments must be submitted online before 6pm Friday week 10. n The document only (without coversheet) should be uploaded into Turnitin only once and before submission is due. n Make sure that all group members' names are documented on the cover sheet and the assessment document. Any names missing will receive zero marks for this assessment.