Reference no: EM131629289

Reviews the political, social, and economic factors influencing policy analysis and planning for analyzing, solving, and resolving practical problems designed for policy issues facing federal, state, local, and nonprofit sectors.

Examines quantitative and qualitative methods, processes, and concepts of public policy analysis and develops skills in applying critical thinking skills, analytical techniques, and various forms of structured analytical writing and communications. The role and ethical dimensions of policy analysis and evaluation in the policy making process are discussed.

Please provide 250 word responses to each question below, original work is required.

1) "Approaches to Forecasting Policy Outcomes" Please respond to the following:

• Describe a real or hypothetical situation that requires someone to make a policy decision. Then, select one of the three approaches to forecasting to apply: extrapolative, theoretical, or judgmental. Provide at least two reasons for your selection of the forecasting approach.

2) Types of Forecasting" Please respond to the following:

• Debate It: Take a position for or against this statement: It is better to be approximately right than exactly wrong. Provide at least two reasons and one hypothetical example to support your position.

3) "Prescribing Preferred Policies" Please respond to the following:

• Explain two of the six criteria for policy prescription, (a) effectiveness, (b) efficiency, (c) adequacy, (d) equity, (e) responsiveness, and (f) appropriateness. Then, describe a real or hypothetical public policy issue and select which of the two criteria you believe would be the most beneficial to use in deciding a policy. Provide at least two reasons for your selection.

• Debate It: Take a position for or against the following statement: Rational choice is not possible. Discuss how different types of rationality are related to different criteria for prescription. Provide at least two reasons and two examples to support your response.

4) "Monitoring Observed Policy Outcomes" Please respond to the following:

• Discuss the relationship between ill-structured problems and approaches to monitoring. Then, describe a real or hypothetical problem and recommend at least one effective way to monitor the policy outcomes. Support your position.

• Use at least two threats to validity and develop a rebuttal to two of the following statements: (a) The greater the cost of an alternative, the less likely it is that the alternative will be pursued. (b) The enforcement of the maximum speed limit of 55 mph increases the costs of exceeding the speed limit. (c) The mileage death rate fell from 4.3 to 3.6 deaths per 100 million miles after the implementation of the 55-mph speed limit. (Refer to Figure 6.13 before responding.)

5) "Monitoring through Experimentation" Please respond to the following:

• Assume you are the program chair of an employment program for students who did not graduate high school but earned a GED (Government Equivalency Degree). You have limited resources and want to determine the factors that ensure students succeed in their jobs. Explain to the program director how the "tiebreaking" experiment might allow the program to uncover that information.