The piece of work which was provided to me was excellent. I am able to understand all complex calculations of Mathematics, All calculations were very clearly solved with each steps provided. Will definitely use it again.

Models tools and techniques: Have the appropriate models tools and techniques for analysis been identified? How appropriate are the descriptions of object oriented and structured approaches that have been included and discussed? 15 Rich Picture: How effectively does the rich picture capture the issues in the case study? Have relevant and appropriate assumptions been made while drawing the rich picture? 20 SSM evaluation: Have SSM been accurately placed on the Matrix of Methods which were discussed by Blum (1994)? How well was the placement argued? 10 References: Has the report used academic references? Are they properly quoted in the report? Are all sources referenced correctly and listed appropriately, both in the body of the report and reference section? (reference, not bibliography) 10 Total Mark Obtained: 100 Sub Total: Sub Total for this assessment task is the Total Mark Obtained *30% Late Submission: Late Submission incurs a 10% penalty for every day the task is late (3 marks) FINAL MARK: The Final Mark for this assessment task is the Sub Total - S1 - Late Submission

Submission Requirements Possible Mark Mark Obtained Analyse and identify the key problems: How completely were the problems identified? Have the problems been appropriately described to capture the essence? Have the 4 ways of treating problems been linked to the key problems identified? Have relevant and appropriate assumptions been made while identifying problems? 15 Hard or Soft system problems: Have the problems been accurately classified as hard or soft systems problems? Is the argument provided for the classification appropriate? Have relevant and appropriate assumptions been made while classifying problems? 20 Key Stakeholders: Have the key stakeholders for the case study been identified and clearly discussed? Have relevant and appropriate assumptions been made while conducting stakeholder analysis? 10

Models tools and techniques 15% Have the appropriate models tools and techniques for analysis been identified? How appropriate are the descriptions of object oriented and structured approaches that have been included and discussed? Rich Picture 20% How effectively does the rich picture capture the issues in the case study? Have relevant and appropriate assumptions been made while drawing the rich picture? SSM evaluation 10% Have SSM been accurately placed on the Matrix of Methods which were discussed by Blum (1994)? How well was the placement argued? References 10% Has the report used academic references? Are they properly quoted in the report? Are

Hard and Soft system problems 20% Have the problems been accurately classified as hard or soft systems problems? Is the argument provided for the classification appropriate? Have relevant and appropriate assumptions been made while classifying problems? Key Stakeholders 10% Have the key stakeholders for the case study been identified and clearly discussed? Have relevant and appropriate assumptions been made while conducting stakeholder analysis?

Assessment The report will be assessed on the following criteria: Criteria Weighting Details Analyse and identify the problems 15% How completely were the problems identified? Have the problems been appropriately described to capture the essence? Have the 4 ways of treating problems been linked to the key problems identified? Have relevant and appropriate assumptions been made while identifying problems?