Referencing • Key ideas from the literature are effectively paraphrased and cited • Direct quotes are used sparingly and are appropriately incorporated • Presentation of in-text citation and reference list match APA 6 style • At least seven (7) credible sources used /10

Evaluate how the communication processes and methods used between health professionals and institutions affected Doug’s experience and outcomes. • Identifies type and exchange of health information • Considers how communication influenced and was influenced by teamwork models /10 Discuss the models of teamwork demonstrated in this scenario, evaluating these for effectiveness. • Correctly identifies models of teamwork. • Evaluates effectiveness of approach in supporting Doug’s health outcomes. /10 Identify and discuss how the clinical reasoning process was implemented in this case and how it could have been improved upon. • Explains how clinical reasoning was applied in this case • Describes how clinical reasoning could have been improved /10

Marking Criteria Comments Mark Writing and Essay structure • Ideas are clearly presented, logically developed and supported throughout essay. • Grammar, spelling and sentence structure (including punctuation) is clear and appropriate to the audience and purpose. /10 Content Demonstrate your understanding of the various contextual factors/issues presented in this case. • Identifies contextual factors/issues presented in this case. • Describes how these factors may be contributing to Doug’s health /10