Please select the relevant topic for my assignment and do the best. Thanks for your help in advance Hi, Thanks for your work. It's really great. as per my tutor, I need some changes in the below topic. "REVIEW OF METHODOLOGY USED IN THE ARTICLE". This solution was a very good one and I received high marks in it, really appreciate the expert a lot, I passed the assignment. Thank a lot for all of your help. The professor was happy with the work.

Quality of sources & presentation (15%) Outstanding and flawless. Clear, concise, and effectively argued within the length allowed; skilled use of academic conventions; accurate proof-reading. Very good control of length; skilled use of academic conventions; nearly all errors eliminated in proof-reading. Competent control of length; good use of academic conventions; accurate spelling, grammar, etc.; careful proof-reading. Length requirements observed; appropriate use of academic conventions; minor errors in spelling, grammar etc.; quite careful proof-reading. Presentation is either too long or too short in relation to content; errors in application of academic conventions; some errors in spelling, grammar etc.; little indication of proof-reading. Very poorly presented work; presentation is either too short or too long (waffling); missing key elements or parts; major errors in spelling, grammar etc.; no indication of proof-reading. Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.

Literature analysis (20%) Outstanding and flawless. Comprehensive, systematic, and critical analysis; authoritative sources included; all citations and references in Harvard format. Critical review and synthesis of ideas; material mostly selected from authoritative sources; almost all citations and references in Harvard format. Good analysis of the literature, quite critical and well-developed; material selected mainly from authoritative sources; most citations and references in Harvard format. Ideas organised into a coherent argument; some critical analysis of ideas; material selected from a mix of sources, including non-authoritative ones; some errors in citations and references. Relatively poor organisation and analysis of ideas; material selected mainly from non-authoritative sources; significant errors in citations and references. Very poor organisation and analysis of ideas; limited sources selected; major errors in citations and references. Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.

Outstanding 100 Excellent (80-89) 85 Very Good (70-79) 75 Good (60-69) 65 Adequate (50-59) 55 Marginal Fail (40-49) 45 Fail (30-39) 35 Not done 0 Introduction to topic & relevant literature map(15%) Outstanding and flawless. Topic introduced in an articulated and well-supported fashion; extensive use of appropriate examples or references; clear and comprehensive literature map. Very good effort at introducing the topic; insightful examples and very good references provided to support arguments; literature map is mostly clear and comprehensive. Good effort at introducing the topic; good examples or references provided to support arguments; literature map lacking minor parts or contributions. Generally adequate effort at introducing the topic; some examples or references provided to support arguments; literature map lacking some parts or contributions. Some effort at introducing the topic; few examples or references provided to support arguments; literature map lacking major parts. Weak effort at introducing the topic; very few examples or references provided; literature map not appropriately developed. Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.

Marking and feedback process Between you handing in your work and then receiving your feedback and marks within 20 days, there are a number of quality assurance processes that we go through to ensure that students receive marks which reflects their work. A brief summary is provided below. • Step One – The module and marking team meet to agree standards, expectations and how feedback will be provided. • Step Two – A subject expert will mark your work using the criteria provided in the assessment brief. • Step Three – A moderation meeting takes place where all members of the teaching and marking team will review the marking of others to confirm whether they agree with the mark and feedback. • Step Four – Work at Levels 5 and 6 then goes to an external examiner who will review a sample of work to confirm that the marking between different staff is consistent and fair. • Step Five – Your mark and feedback is processed by the Office and made available to you.

How will we support you with your assessment? • Assessment briefing in Week 1. • An early draft of sections 1, 2 and 6 to be prepared for Week 6 of the module. This work will be assessed by peers with feedback from the tutor by Week 8. • Every seminar session is linked to your final piece of work to provide guidance and practice. • FAQs will be posted on the module’s Moodle site. How will your work be assessed? Your work will be assessed by a subject expert who will use the marking grid provided in this assessment brief. When you access your marked work it is important that you reflect on the feedback so that you can use it to improve future assignments.

Formative assessment is non-marked work designed to help you develop your main piece of coursework to an acceptable standard for submission. We expect all students to complete the formative assessment which is an interim draft version of report elements 1, 2, and 6 (introduction to topic, literature map, and bibliography, as described above), handed in as a hard copy of no more than 3 sides of A4 during class in Week 6 of the module. This work will then be peer reviewed by a fellow student on the module with final comments from the module tutor. You will be asked to review someone else's work as part of this peer review process. By Week 8, the work will be returned to you and you will be assigned a dissertation supervisor. This interim work will not attract marks but will provide you with valuable feedback on your progress to help you develop your own critiquing skills, and it will be used to assign you to an appropriate dissertation supervisor.

turn-it-in box and will be graded according to the following marking criteria: • Introduction to the topic and description of the relevant literature using appropriate mapping methods (items 1 and 2): 15% • For the literature analysis, breadth and depth of explored research with a clear focus emerging (item 3): 20% • Comprehensive critique of two specific research methods (item 4): 40% • Balanced conclusions following on from earlier analyses (item 5): 10% • Quality of sources and correct presentation (item 6): 15%

You will be able to(1) critically examine scholarly literature andto select, focus, and reflect on choice literature that motivates your (business and management) research to write up a critical review of your chosen literature; (2) understand research design issues, and conceive, frame, and articulate one or more personal research questions that motivate(s) your research; (3) critically evaluate, draw on, and present, orally and in writing, appropriate research methods to collect empirical data for your research project; (4) critically evaluate, select, and draw on quantitative and/or qualitative data analysis methods for your research project.

This is my Management Research Methods (MRM) assignment. I have attached the introduction and requirement for the assignment. Also, I have attached the example of the assignment.Kindly have a look on the report and provide me with the solution accordingly. Thanks You will be able to develop a deep understanding of the epistemology and ontology bases for research, as well as research methodology in the field of management. You will appreciate the different phases of research, and the nature and characteristics of each of them.