Reference no: EM131786784

Attacks on TCP/IP Protocols

Lab Overview

The learning objective of this lab is for students to gain the first-hand experience on the vulnerabilities of TCP/IP protocols, as well as on attacks against these vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities in the TCP/IP protocols represent a special genre of vulnerabilities in protocol designs and implementations; they provide an invaluable lesson as to why security should be designed in from the beginning, rather than being added as an afterthought. Moreover, studying these vulnerabilities help students understand the challenges of network security and why many network security measures are needed. Vulnerabilities of the TCP/IP protocols occur at several layers.

Lab Environment

Environment Setup

Network Setup. To conduct this lab, students need to have at least 3 machines. One computer is used for attacking, the second computer is used as the victim, and the third computer is used as the observer. Students can set up 3 virtual machines on the same host computer, or they can set up 2 virtual machines, and then use the host computer as the third computer.

Lab Tasks

In this lab, students need to conduct attacks on the TCP/IP protocols. They can use the Netwox tools and/or other tools in the attacks. All the attacks are performed on Linux operating systems. However, instructors can require students to also conduct the same attacks on other operating systems and compare the observations.

To simplify the "guess" of TCP sequence numbers and source port numbers, we assume that attacks are on the same physical network as the victims. Therefore, you can use sniffer tools to get that information. The following is the list of attacks that need to be implemented.

Task (1) : ARP cache poisoning
The ARP cache is an important part of the ARP protocol. Once a mapping between a MAC address and an IP address is resolved as the result of executing the ARP protocol, the mapping will be cached. Therefore, there is no need to repeat the ARP protocol if the mapping is already in the cache. However, because the ARP protocol is stateless, the cache can be easily poisoned by maliciously crafted ARP messages. Such an attack is called the ARP cache poisoning attack.

In such an attack, attackers use spoofed ARP messages to trick the victim to accept an invalid MAC-to- IP mapping, and store the mapping in its cache. There can be various types of consequences depending on the motives of the attackers. For example, attackers can launch a DoS attack against a victim by associating a nonexistent MAC address to the IP address of the victim's default gateway; attackers can also redirect the traffic to and from the victim to another machine, etc.

In this task, you need to demonstrate how the ARP cache poisoning attack work. Several commands can be useful in this task. In Linux we can use command arp to check the current mapping between IP address and MAC.

Task (2) : ICMP Redirect Attack

The ICMP redirect message is used by routers to provide the up-to-date routing information to hosts, which initially have minimal routing information. When a host receives an ICMP redirect message, it will modify its routing table according to the message. Because of the lack of validation, if attackers want the victim to set its routing information in a particular way, they can send spoofed ICMP redirect messages to the victim, and trick the victim to modify its routing table.

In this task, you should demonstrate how the ICMP redirect attack works, and describe the observed consequence. To check the routing information in Linux, you can use the command route.

Task (3) : SYN Flooding Attack

SYN flood is a form of DoS attack in which attackers send many SYN requests to a victim's TCP port, but the attackers have no intention to finish the 3-way handshake procedure. Attackers either use spoofed IP address or do not continue the procedure. Through this attack, attackers can flood the victim's queue that is used for half-opened connections, i.e. the connections that has finished SYN, SYN-ACK, but has not yet got a final ACK back. When this queue is full, the victim cannot take any more connection. Figure ?? illustrates the attack.
The size of the queue has a system-wide setting. In Linux, we can check the system queue size setting using the following command:
# sysctl -q net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog

We can use command "netstat -na" to check the usage of the queue, i.e., the number of half- opened connection associated with a listening port. The state for such connections is SYN-RECV. If the 3-way handshake is finished, the state of the connections will be ESTABLISHED.

In this task, you need to demonstrate the SYN flooding attack. You can use the Netwox tool to conduct the attack, and then use a sniffer tool to capture the attacking packets. While the attack is ongoing, run the "netstat -na" command on the victim machine, and compare the result with that before the attack. Please also describe how you know whether the attack is successful or not.

Task (4) : TCP RST Attacks on telnet and ssh Connections

The TCP RST Attack can terminate an established TCP connection between two victims. For example, if there is an established telnet connection (TCP) between two users A and B, attackers can spoof a RST packet from A to B, breaking this existing connection. To succeed in this attack, attackers need to correctly construct the TCP RST packet.

In this task, you need to launch an TCP RST attack to break an existing telnet connection between A and B. After that, try the same attack on an ssh connection. Please describe your observations. To simply the lab, we assume that the attackers and the victims are on the same LAN, i.e., attackers can observe the TCP traffic between A and B.

Task (5) : TCP RST Attacks on Video Streaming Applications

Let us make the TCP RST attack more interesting by experimenting it on the applications that are widely used in nowadays. We choose the video streaming application in this task. For this task, you can choose a video streaming web site that you are familiar with (we will not name any specific web site here). Most of video sharing websites establish a TCP connection with the client for streaming the video content. The attacker's goal is to disrupt the TCP session established between the victim and video streaming machine. To simplify the lab, we assume that the attacker and the victim are on the same LAN. In the following, we describe the common interaction between a user (the victim) and some video-streaming web site:

The victim browses for a video content in the video-streaming web site, and selects one of the videos for streaming.

Normally video contents are hosted by a different machine, where all the video contents are located. After the victim selects a video, a TCP session will be established between the victim machine and the content server for the video streaming. The victim can then view the video he/she has selected.

Your task is to disrupt the video streaming by breaking the TCP connection between the victim and the content server. You can let the victim user browse the video-streaming site from another (virtual) machine or from the same (virtual) machine as the attacker. Please be noted that, to avoid liability issues, any attacking packets should be targeted at the vitim machine (which is the machine run by yourself), not the content server machine (which does not belong to you).

Task (6) : ICMP Blind Connection-Reset and Source-Quench Attacks

ICMP messages can also be used achieve the connection-reseting attack. To do this, attackers send an ICMP error message that indicates a "hard error" to either of the two endpoints of a TCP connection. The connection can be immediately torn down as RFC 1122 states that a host should abort the corresponding connection when receiving such an ICMP error message. RFC 1122 defines "hard errors" as ICMP error messages of type 3 (Destination Unreachable) with code 2 (protocol unreachable), 3 (port unreachable), or 4 (fragmentation needed and DF bit set).

The ICMP source quench message is used by the congested routers to tell the TCP senders to slow down.

Attackers can forge such messages to conduct the denial of services attacks on TCP senders.

In this task, you need to launch the ICMP blind connect-reset attacks and the ICMP source quench attacks. You need to be noted that some systems may reasonably ignore this type of ICMP errors in certain TCP state. You need to describe your observations in the lab report.

Task (7) : TCP Session Hijacking

The objective of the TCP Session Hijacking attack is to hijack an existing TCP connection (session) between two victims by injecting malicious contents into this session. If this connection is a telnet session, attackers can inject malicious commands into this session, causing the victims to execute the malicious commands. We will use telnet in this task. We also assume that the attackers and the victims are on the same LAN.

4 Lab Report

You should submit a lab report. The report should cover the following sections:

Design: The design of your attacks, including the attacking strategies, the packets that you use in your attacks, the tools that you used, etc.

Observation: Is your attack successful? How do you know whether it has succeeded or not? What do you expect to see? What have you observed? Is the observation a surprise to you?

Explanation: Some of the attacks might fail. If so, you need to find out what makes them fail. You can find the explanations from your own experiments (preferred) or from the Internet. If you get the explanation from the Internet, you still need to find ways to verify those explanations through your own experiments. You need to convince us that the explanations you get from the Internet can indeed explain your observations.

Attachment:- Attack Lab.pdf