I got a perfect graduate paper with sufficient references in the form of both in-text as well as an end-of-text citation. I am feeling highly obliged with the work quality that I was provided with and my class teacher also appreciated the paper in the class. The appreciation I got was just because of you so I would like to congratulate your whole team. Applauds!!

Presentation The presentation is well-organized, reflects The presentation is well organized, reflects the The presentation is well organized. Fail to present valid the report information clearly with excellent presentation skills. (3 marks) report information clearly. (2 marks) (1 marks) information. (0 marks)

Reference More than 20 bibliographic items (all More than 20 bibliographic items More than 10 bibliographic items Less than 10 reference of them are academic (most of them are (most of them are items are papers) are correctly academic papers) are academic papers and presented. presented and inline presented, but there are a all given papers are More than 7 citations are correctly few errors. In- line presented) are errors in the used. citations are used but presented. In-line bibliographic (2 marks) with a few errors. (1.5 marks) citations are often used incorrectly. (1 marks) list and in-line citations. (0 marks)

Scientific Use appropriate Use discipline specific Use some discipline Fail to writing in language and genre to language and genres to specific language and demonstrate Executive extend the knowledge address gaps of a self prescribed genre to understanding Summary, of a range of audiences. selected audience. Apply demonstrate for lecturer as Introduction, Use appropriate innovatively the understanding from a the audience. and language and genre to knowledge developed to stated perspective and Fail to apply Conclusions extend the knowledge of a range of audiences and properly explain a different context. (2-3 marks) for a specified audience. Apply to different contexts the to a similar context the knowledge the chosen program. knowledge developed. developed. (4-5 marks) (1 marks) (0 marks)

Evaluation A detailed and clear A detailed evaluation and A detailed evaluation Fail to provide and evaluation and justification of chosen and justification proper Justification justification of chosen testing method and provided BUT only for justification on chosen testing method and testing tool(s) provided testing method/tools. on for selected testing method and testing tool(s) provided based on the program’s BUT they are NOT best suited for the program. (1 marks) testing method and tools. tools specification. (4-5 marks) (2-3 marks) (0 marks)

Assignment 2 (20%=20 Marks) Criteria Excellent Satisfactory Average Marginal Literature Collect and record self Collect and record self Collect and record Review determined information/data from determined information/data from required information/data from self-selected sources, self selected sources, self selected sources choosing or devising an choosing an appropriate using one of the several appropriate methodology based on prescribed methodology with self structured guidelines. methodologies. structured guidelines. Organise Organise Organise information/data using information/data using information/data using student determined recommended student determined structures, and manage structures. Manage self structures and the processes, within the determined processes management of parameters set by the with multiple possible processes. Generate guidelines. Generate pathways. Respond to questions/aims/hypothe questions/aims/ questions/tasks ses based on literature hypotheses framed generated from a surveyed by student within structured closed inquiry. himself/herself. (4-5 marks) guidelines. (2-3 marks) (1 marks)

An evaluation and justification of your chosen testing method and tool(s) based on the program. A conclusions chapter which summarises major findings of the study and indicates future work which should be conducted in the area. A bibliography list of all cited papers and other resources. IEEE and Harvard are preferred. Please prepare your references according to the guidance.

Your report should consist of the following chapters: 1. A proper title which matches the contents of your report. 2. Your name and Deakin student number in the author line. 3. An executive summary which summarises your findings. You may need hints on writing good executive summaries. 4. An introduction chapter which explains about your chosen program, test methods and test tools. 5. A literature review chapter which surveys the latest academic papers regarding software testing and testing tools which include all papers listed below. You are advised to identify and include more papers published by ACM and IEEE journals or conference proceedings. Your review must not simply be a summary of each paper, but rather a deep analysis of the body of work reported in the set of paper. Your aim in this part of the report is to demonstrate deep and thorough understanding of the existing body of knowledge encompassing software testing. The minimum number of references for this assignment is 20.

Please note that provided program is just an example of what you can use. It is your choice to use this program or any other program with the same level of complexity including web application as you wish. Also, note that you need to use the same program for your assignment 2. Upon satisfactory completion of this assignment, you will be able to conduct basic level research in software engineering, analyse gathered information, and communicate your findings. To demonstrate your achievement of these goals, you must write a 3,000-word report.