Discussion of transformation of IT in Intel is excellent. Critically reviewed all strategies excellently. Excellent presentation, logically structured, using correct grammar and spelling, excellent cross-referencing and links to supporting evidence. The answer is complete in all respects. (15-20 marks) Complete evaluation on Critical Reflections 10 Marks received /Total marks 100

Deliverable (Poster presentation) Overall design and contents of poster (5 marks) Presentation skill; Q & A (5 marks) 10 Deliverable (Task 2) (Turnitin based Submission) Adequate details provided but very generic. However the overall answer is in the context of Intel’s case study. Factors / issues / challenges explored partially. (1-14 marks) Strategies explored and discussion of transformation of IT in Intel is good. Critically reviewed the strategies. Evidence of reading and analyzing case study. Overall good attempt. (15-24 marks) 20

Marks Maximum marks Work Proposal: (Turnitin based Submission) Proposal is incomplete but has relevant information (1-6 marks) Complete and excellent proposal (7-10 marks) 10 Deliverable (Task 1) (Turnitin based Submission) Research article ? Approach to the problem and research questions; objectives; (10 marks) ? Rigor of literature review; (10 marks) ? Methods or empirical analysis techniques; used data sources; (10 marks) ? Key findings and conclusions; (10 marks) ? Citations and referencing ( 5 marks) ? IEEE format; Academic writing (5 marks) 50

5. Submission dates Softcopy of the assignment must be uploaded to Moodle by 5; 11:59 PM 6. Important note Any assignment submitted after the submission date will be subject to MEC Regulations on late submission of work. Please refer to the late submission policy in the PG student handbook. Please do not search the internet for an article and merely present it as your own. Plagiarism will be dealt with as per the regulations. Please refer to the plagiarism policy in the PG student handbook.

For a mark of 40-49% • Show a barely adequate understanding of the purpose of the exercise. • Display knowledge of some of the principles, theories, methodologies, and practices involved and attempt to apply them. • Provide evidence of reading limited relevant literature. • Attempt some analysis and discussion. • Show some ability to link theory to problems and provide solutions. • Provide some individual contribution For a mark of 25-39% • Made an attempt to complete the exercise. • Show little or no understanding of the principles, theories, and practices involved. • No evidence of academic reading. • An inability to recognize the key points.

For a mark of 50-59% • Show an adequate understanding of the activity. • Display knowledge of some of the principles, theories, methodologies, and practices involved and an ability to apply them. • Provide evidence of some reading related to the proposal. • Demonstrate an ability to select key points in the exercise and analyse them. • Provide approaches that are less creative or might not be entirely practical. • Provide a critique of your own work. • Provide discussions of further research that may be needed. • Provide an adequate individual contribution

For a mark of 60-69% • Show a clear understanding of the activity. • Display knowledge of most of the principles, theories, methodologies, and practices involved and an ability to apply them effectively. • Provide evidence of wide reading. • Demonstrate an ability to select critical points and analyse them and draw sound conclusions. • Provide approaches that are creative and pragmatic. • Provide a supported critique of your own work. • Provide supported, discussions of further research that may be needed. • Provide a good individual contribution

Assessment Criteria The assignment will be assessed out of 100 marks using the below mentioned criteria. For a mark of >69% • Show a thorough understanding of the purpose of the activity. • Display knowledge of the major principles, theories, methodologies, and practices involved and an ability to apply them effectively. • Provide evidence of wide reading, including academic journals. • Demonstrate an ability to select critical points, evaluate them and communicate the conclusions effectively. • Provide approaches that are creative, practicable, and supported. • Provide a sound, supported critique of your own work. • Provide sound and supported discussions of further research that may be needed. • Provide a very good individual contribution