Demonstrate a critical awareness of previous research

Reference no: EM132313377

Topic - Cloud Computing

Overview

The purpose of this assessment is to enable students to demonstrate a critical awareness of previous research in an IT context within a chosen topic area through a basic understanding of research theory and techniques. It requires clear communication of ideas in a professional manner so that the reader can easily understand the purpose and results of your research. Overall goals of this assignment are to help you to:

• Become more knowledgeable about finding and using varied research sources in your chosen area in IT.
• Further develop your critical thinking skills and back up your points with evidence.
• Become more adept at synthesizing information and developing informed views.
• Discipline yourself to follow a scholarly research format to document in-text sources and a references page (bibliography).
• Compose a well-organized, clear, concise, research proposal to expand your knowledge on a research question in your chosen area.

Learning Outcomes

The following course learning outcomes are assessed by completing this assessment:
Knowledge:

K1. Determine the role IT research plays in contributing to organisational innovation, and success. K2. Critique advanced communication theory for organisations.
K3. Identify appropriate research philosophies for IT projects, which match organisational approaches.
K4. Identify appropriate methodologies and methods, for an organisational IT research project.

Skills:

S1. Utilise effective communication practice in organisations.
S2. Demonstrate expert English language skills in academic and professional contexts.
S3. Evaluate the quality and utility of literature sourced.
S4. Undertake a literature review for an organisational IT research project.

Application of knowledge and skills:

A1. Compose a research proposal and report on a topic related to an organisational IT research project.

A2. Present written and oral reports to academic and organisational audiences.

Assessment Details

Background
The research report provides a detailed description of a proposed research idea. It is similar to an essay and needs to be in a formal style with introduction, body and conclusion. In addition it requires a critical analysis and a coherent presentation.

Requirements
Each group is required to submit a mini research report (2500-3000 words excluding the title, abstract, table of contents and references/bibliography). The purpose of this task is to assist students to prepare and write a scholarly paper at an appropriate standard for this level of study.

You have already done quite a bit of work for this research in tutorials: you should have a tentative research issue, strategies and evidence to persuade your readers about the significance of the problem you're researching, as well as the validity of your research issues. You also should consider opposing views or good counter-arguments that you can address in order to help establish your credibility and enhance the relevance of your paper.

A. Report Layout
The mini research report must contain the following sections, submitted in the order as listed below-
• Title - selection of an informative title
• Abstract - summarization of the significant concepts in the proposed study focusing on key aspects (300 words max)
• Introduction - outline of the thesis, problem, research question, etc. (stating the thesis/theory in terms of relationship among variables and examining the problem or investigating the question, or the like) and preview of the structure of the paper.
• Literature Review- demonstration of the ability to find significant sources, familiarity with the existing body of knowledge, analysis of existing research, and learning through a careful reading of existing scholarship.
• Methodology- procedures and processes undertaken in your investigation/study including the research design- study type, variables, and data collection methods (as applicable).
• Discussion and implications of research - Discuss with reasons whether your study needs Ethics clearance. Discuss findings that might occur and their potential impact on the field
• References- include relevant literature sources (in-text citation and a list of full- text references)
• Appendices (if applicable) - tables, graphs, charts or any other- related to the study not included in the main paper but referred to.

Attachment:- Professional Research and Communication.rar

Reference no: EM132313377

Questions Cloud

Write an essay on Robotics in Hospitals : You will need to write an essay of 1800-1900 words based on the following requirements. Organisation Chosen: Robotics in Hospitals

Attributes for starbucks-coca-cola or ikea : Please specify some of these attributes for Starbucks, Coca-Cola or IKEA. Please help me with this question.

Calculate the quantity and price that maximizes : a. Calculate the quantity and price that maximizes the profit for the monopolist. b. What is the efficient level of output (maximizes social welfare)

Market for ramen noodles when the recession hits : Using the supply and demand model, explain what you expect to happen in (1) the market for spinach linguine and (2) the market for ramen noodles

Demonstrate a critical awareness of previous research : ITECH5500 - Professional Research and Communication - Research Proposal - demonstrate a critical awareness of previous research in an IT context

Issue of the wall street journal : Based on the article "Global Meat Companies Feast on China's Pig Problems" from the May 3, 2019 issue of the Wall Street Journal, please respond

Aim of this assessment is to analyse : The aim of this assessment is to analyse an article taken from the Financial Times (or another relevant economic newspaper) relating

Explain how K-means clustering work : What is clustering and why is it becoming increasingly popular? Explain how "K-means" clustering work. Create a new thread for your response

Why are banks one of the most regulated : Why are banks one of the most regulated and examined industries in the U.S?

Reviews

len2313377

5/29/2019 1:39:24 AM

Overall Organization 9-10 Well-planned, logically-flowing and well-thought out. Includes informative title, 6-8 Good overall organization and somewhat logically-flowing. Includes title, 3-5 There is a sense of organization. Includes title, abstract with few key aspects and a 0-2 No/lack of sense of organization. Missing title and/or a TOC. Also missing abstract or /10 References 9-10 An appropriate number of authoritative references in APA style 6-8 Authoritative references in APA style with some deficiencies 3-5 Few authoritative references in APA style with many deficiencies 0-2 Too few authoritative references in poor adherence to APA /10

len2313377

5/29/2019 1:39:18 AM

Discussion of implications of research 8-10 Exceptionally well- presented and argued. Ideas are detailed, well- developed, supported with specific evidence and facts, as well as in-depth analysis. 6-7 Well-presented and argued. Ideas are detailed, developed and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific, displays evidence of basic analysis. 3-5 Content is sound. Ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported; some evidence of analysis, but usually of a generalized nature. 0-2 Content is presented but not sound, and analysis is vague or not evident. /10

len2313377

5/29/2019 1:39:11 AM

Methods (and Methodology) 14-20 Appropriate procedures and processes included and clear design of the research addressed. 8-13 Procedures and processes are included, and research design is somewhat clear. 4-7 Some procedures and processes included, and research design is not clear. 0-3 Procedures and processes are absent or vague, and research design is not addressed or very poorly addressed. /20

len2313377

5/29/2019 1:39:06 AM

Literature Review 14-20 Sources are exceptionally well- integrated and they support claims argued in the paper very effectively. 8-13 Sources are well integrated and support the paper’s claims. 4-7 Sources support some claims made in the paper, but might not be integrated well within the paper’s argument. 0-3 The paper does not use adequate research or if it does, the sources are not integrated well. /20

len2313377

5/29/2019 1:39:00 AM

Introduction 8-10 Strong introduction of topic’s key question(s) and terms. Clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed. Specific thesis statement. 6-7 Conveys topic and key question(s). Clearly delineates subtopics to be reviewed. General thesis statement. 3-5 Conveys topic, but not key question(s). Describes subtopics to be reviewed. General thesis statement. 0-2 Does not adequately convey topic. Does not describe subtopics to be reviewed. Lacks adequate thesis statement. /20

len2313377

5/29/2019 1:38:54 AM

Student Id. Student Name Category Excellent Good Acceptable Poor/Unacceptable Marks Abstract 8-10 Very coherent and succinct statement of the problem, motivation and proposed methodology 6-7 Coherent and succinct statement of the problem, motivation and proposed methodology 3-5 Statement of the problem, motivation and proposed methodology 0-2 No abstract or poorly structured abstract /10

Write a Review

Required(*) Message

What are the stated objectives of the policy

What are the stated objectives of the policy? In your judgment, what are the covert objectives of the policy?

Relationship between the individual and medicine

Has the necessity of cultural capital now completely changed the relationship between the individual and medicine?

How should a publishing business respond

Now that digital publishing is so accessible to everyone, how should a publishing business respond? Are there ways that existing publishing houses can take.

Proofreading department productivity

How will this new system affect the proofreading department's productivity?

Which variable in the regression equation represents the

1.if the result of a hypothesis test for a proportion is statistically significant thena the population proportion must

How does a mentoring program differ from an induction

write a 1000- to 1200-word paper addressing the following middothow does a mentoring program differ from an induction

Moisturising lotion-dermatologist recommended brand

In an ad for moisturizing lotion, the following claim is made: "it's the #1 dermatologist recommended brand." What is misleading about the claim?

Evaluate david humes agruments against induction

Explain and evaluate David Humes agruments against induction ( including the notion of the role the principle of the uniformity of nature plays in the aruguement) and also arguements against cause and effect.

A summary of your analysis of the organizational culture

Please provide a summary of your analysis of the organizational culture at your current or a previous organization (Security), in which you were employed.

Prior to a set of compensation policy changes

Prior to a set of compensation policy changes at a company 40% of the employees surveyed said that they liked their job very much, 50% said that they liked their job moderately, and the remaining employees said that they were dissatisfied with their ..

Find four advertisements that seem to tell stories

Find four advertisements that seem to tell stories or portray relationships in magazines using human models .

Explain how james rachels argues against cultural relativism

Define Cultural Relativism and explain how James Rachels argues against it. Discuss Ethical Egoism, and arguments for and against it as an ethical position.

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

User Account

All Pages