Reference no: EM131605383
This is your Research Project for CJ 230 Evidence Forensics. Once you read the instructions then I suggest you begin your research on one set of these specific Supreme Court Cases.
During Week 3 you will need to submit an outline of your paper along with a list of your references. You can submit your assignment under the Assessment Tab in the Classroom.
During Week 5 you will need to submit your Research Project. You can submit your assignment under the Assessment Tab in the Classroom.
Select one of the groups of three court cases listed below. Research each case and identify the U.S. Supreme Court's decision and how these police related issues became a Landmark case. Discuss the circumstances surrounding the case and explain why the initial conviction was overturned and how this case made such a significant impact on the entire jurisprudence of Law Enforcement. What were some of the similarities of these cases yet how did they differ? What are your thoughts on the split decisions made from the Supreme Court Justices?
Group 1
Miranda v Arizona 1966
Escobedo v Illinois 1964
Gideon v Wainwright 1963
Group 2
Mapp v. Ohio 1961
Wolf v. Colorado 1949
Weeks v. United States 1914United States 1914United States 1914United States 1914United States 1914United States 1914United States 1914United States 1914
Group 3
Moran v. Burbine 1986
Brown v. Mississippi 1936
Arizona v. Fulminate 1991
Group 4
Terry v Ohio 1968
Beck v. Ohio 1964
Brown v. Texas 1979
The body of your paper must be between 3-5pages. It must also be in APAformat, which shall include an abstract, separate titlepage and referencepage. The Final Project is due by Wednesday during week seven.
Week 3 Assignment: Research Paper Outline
During Week 3 you will need to submit an outline of your paper along with a list of your references (APAFormatt). You can submit your work under this tab.
|
Prepare a memorandum to the audit manager
: Prepare a memorandum to the Audit Manager, outlining your risk assessment relating to Wild Forest Limited based on the above situations
|
|
Inquiry or fundamental questioning
: Why do people tend to evade inquiry or fundamental questioning? Develop your position statement related to this question.
|
|
Will social media be like this
: I'm sure, with great loss. Some of it, though, seems to be to our benefit. Will social media be like this? Will it weaken some aspects of communication
|
|
Suggestion for a culture change process any organization
: What I have described is an analogy for any organization, profit or non-profit. What is your suggestion for a culture change process any organization?
|
|
Define the supreme court justices
: What were some of the similarities of these cases yet how did they differ? What are your thoughts on the split decisions made from the Supreme Court Justices
|
|
Differences in intercultural verbal communication styles
: Differences in intercultural verbal communication styles can often create misunderstandings and conflict in intercultural interactions.
|
|
Scope of kayla education
: Given the scope of Kayla's education, training, and years of experience as a CMA, would this favor fall within the AAMA guidelines of her responsibilities?
|
|
Discuss what are you going to do with the vehicle
: The driver has been drinking and appears to be under the influence. As the owner of the vehicle can he legally give you consent to search
|
|
Find the maximum value attained by f
: Use a graph of f(x) = 2 sin(x2) to determine where an antiderivative, F, of this function reaches its maximum on 0 = x = 3.
|