I was privileged to work with this writer who showed his experience in the subject area with a well-structured paper presentation. Thank you so much.

Rubric Score Grade points Percentage Low High Low High Low High 3.5 4.0 0 0 90% 100% 2.5 3.49 0 0 80% 89.99% 1.7 2.49 0 0 70% 79.99% 1.0 1.69 0 0 60% 69.99% 0.0 1.00 0 0 0 59.99%

Intrepretation of Statistical Results Attemped to provide an overview of the evidence reviewed, but lacked statistically significant data. Attemped to provide a descriptive statistic overview of the evidence reviewed, inlcuding the sample size, p-factor and strength of evidence. But, unable to clearly intrept stength of evidence and the intrepretation was inaccurate. Attemped to provide a descriptive statistic overview of the evidence reviewed, inlcuding the sample size, p-factor and strength of evidence. But, unable to clearly intrept stength of evidence. Provides a descriptive statistic overview of the evidence reviewed, inlcuding the sample size, p-factor and strength of evidence. 0 30% 0.00 Length Less than 12 slides. NA NA Presentation length 12-15. 0 5% 0.00 Format/Style Did not follow APA format Major errors with APA formatting Text, title page, and references page follow APA guidelines . Minor references and grammar errors Text, title page and references page follow APA guidelines. No grammar, word usage or punctuation errors. Overall style is consistent with professional work. 0 10% 0.00

Database Review Did not provide a review of the evidence from a database search Provide a brief overview of database results, not clearly linked to high levels of evidence Defined database results clearly, without generating a key clinical question Defined database results clearly, generated from key clinical question database search results 0 20% 0.00 Level 1 & 2 Evidence Only referenced Level 5-7 evidence, based on expert opinion andcase study reviews. Referenced research results from Level 4 and below Only referenced Level 3 evidence Referenced randomized control study research and systematic review of randomized control studies (Level 1 and 2 evidence) 0 15% 0.00

Instructions: Enter total points possible in cell C14, under the rubric. Next enter scores (between 0 and 4) into yellow cells only in column F. Interpreting Statistical Output for Data Analysis Presentation Unsatisfacotry Satisfactory Average Excellent Score Weight Final Score 1 2 3 4 Defined Key Clinical Questions Did not clearly define clinical question for research Attempted to define clinical question, without any reference necessary for database search Vaguely defined clinical question without the reference necessary for database research Clearly defined key clinical question used to search evidence-based databank (i.e, Pubmed, Medline, CINAHL, etc) 0 20% 0.00