Reference no: EM132439223
Below, please provide specific examples from the film to support your ideas/claims. Integrate at least two sources: Onefrom the book and one from the film. Be sure to include proper APA citations within your document and at the end (reference section).
Question 1. Define patterns of persuasion, conformity,minority influence, and other social influences. Provide specific exampleswitnessed in the film.
Question 2. First define the terms stereotypes and prejudice. Next, analyze issues of stereotypes and prejudice observed while watching the jurors deliberate in the film. There are many to choose from!
Question 3. In psychology, heuristics are simple, efficient rules which people often use to form judgments and make decisions. They are mental shortcuts that usually involve focusing on one aspect of a complex problem and ignoring others.Provide an example ofthree cognitive heuristics represented in the film and label them (e.g. availability, false consensus, social proof). Next, define the three heuristics that you selected. Explain where/how the three heuristics occurred in the film.
Question 4. Define the term catalyst for change. Next, interpret the catalyst for change that resulted in the outcome of the film, based on your perceptions. How does this line up with some of the research in social psychology?
Question 5. Define groupthink and group polarization. Next, explainhow the film demonstrated groupthink and group polarization.